Scale for judging women's looks

[Tron]

[ QUOTE ]
This thread has been soooo many times, a couple in the last couple of weeks.

esit: also, your examples of each really suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only thing worse than these posts are the inevitable responses touting the merits of the 2 or 3 (EDIT: or 4) point scales.

[DMBFan23]

[ QUOTE ]
I use the a slightly different scale

4. You would bang her when drunk only if she was at your house

3. You would go somewhere else to bang her if you were drunk

2. You would bang her sober

1. You would take her out in public and show her off.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol I like this scale because it admits that there is pretty much always a circumstance where youd hit it

[GambleGamble]

I use a much different scale....which I think in reality most OOTers use

1 - Will she do me
2 - Wont she do me

[mrkilla]

Your standards are way to low for OOT

[mannika]

I'm a fan of the following scale:

- I wouldn't throw it in her
- I'd throw it in her with a bag over her head and the lights off
- I'd throw it in her with the lights off
- I'd throw it in her
- I'd throw it in her multiple times
- I'd throw it in her multiple times on the dining room table
- I'd throw it in her multiple times with my family watching
- I'd throw it in her multiple times with my family and dead relatives watching

AND...
- I'd throw it in her multiple times with my family, dead relatives and the pope watching

(Yes, I sometimes actually use this scale)

[VayaConDios]

Like meat -

A: model

B: cute

C: doable

D: doable drunk

Anything unfit for human consumption is not rated.

[pokerlaw]

Back in college me and my friends devised the binary ranking system.

To illustrate: look at a girl. Then, ask if you would f*ck her? if the answer is yes, she's a 1. if no, she's a 0.

Due to alcohol, a 0 can be mistaken for a 1. However, as long as you she was a 1 in your mind/state when you took her home, its all good (i.e., you get a free pass regarding getting sh*t from your buddies). However, if you take said 0 home a second time, you are subject to being mocked and ridiculed.

[bigt2k4]

ok, my scale has 0s for people you never even have the thought about. 1s and 2s are girls that you sort of think about maybe feeling her up or something when you're drunk and really horny. 3s and 4s are girls you would think about doing and might even do if really drunk and/or horny. 5s and 6s are the girls that you might do while totally sober and would definitely do while drunk/horny. Also, you might fantasize about a 5 or 6 from time to time and enjoy it, where as the lower numbers you think about it for a second and then go "nah, but maybe, no...no I can't"

I had a detailed scale in a previous thread between 1 and 3 months ago and I don't feel like searching for it and I don't really feel like going into much detail in this post.

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]
i've always functioned under the idea that by definition a 5 is the ugliest girl you'd be fine about admiting to hooking up with sober. it's a good starting point for the scale and you go up or down from there.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not bad, but mine's even harsher. Mine basically uses the familiar school grading system. A 6 out of 10 is below average and starting to fail, and you'd better be drunk or sufficiently ugly yourself. A 5 is already disaster; anything less than that starts involving abnormalities or inbreeding.

I think women mostly come in at 6 to 7.5. There is a portion of 8's around, but they tend to degrade quickly into 7's or below, which is probably the natural resting place of people who don't take remarkably good care of themselves or simply aren't very young anymore. 9's and up are pretty uncommon, especially if you get out of the wealthy areas that tend to naturally absorb them from everywhere else.

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]
Like meat -

A: model

B: cute

C: doable

D: doable drunk

Anything unfit for human consumption is not rated.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe the best abbreviated scale I've seen.