Scale for judging women's looks

sternroolz · #1 04-27-2006, 10:11 AM

Reading the recent jennicide post made me wonder what some guys are smoking. Fortunately, most of the guys got it right and "7" is in the huge lead. Anyway, maybe the scale some of us use is off...so I propose to post the following:

1......Ugly horrible, not hitable at all. Gross, disgusting. I cannot think of one person that qualifies for a 1.

2......Not much better than a 1. Horrible obese or disfigured face. Whoopi Goldberg.

3......Most really fat chicks. Also women that are really ugly. I think Rosie O'Donnell qualifies as a 3.

4......Ok, this is just under average looking....most overweight girls(unless they are really cute in the face) taht are not more than 30 lbs or so overweight. Most girls that get a four are kinda fugly. Ellen Degeneres.

5.......Very plain and ordinary. Sometimes can be a fat chick that is cute. Most of the time its just a run of the mill looking girl that is neither very cute, nor attractive...just average. Maybe like Tina Yothers.

6.......Ok, girls here can sometimes have buttery faces if they have a smoking hot body. Also very cute girls that are kinda heavy..maybe 30 lbs overweight max if they have a huge rack as well. Annie Duke.

7.......Cute girls with nice boddies...but not model type. The kind you might see as the hottest girl in your local bar. 7's is were girls really start getting attractive and cute....have to have a nice body and a pretty face. Jennicide fits this category well.

8......Really hot. The girls you see outside the nightclubs in Vegas that look smoking. Also most of the hot strippers fall in this rating. Eliza Dushku.

9.....Goddess...really gorgeous. Model type. Guys falling over themselves. Nicki Coxx, Gina Gershon, the brunette from Rounders.

10......best looking women on the planet....Pamela Anderson, Jessica Alba, Carmen Electra, etc.

Gunny Highway · #2 04-27-2006, 10:18 AM

This thread has been soooo many times, a couple in the last couple of weeks.

esit: also, your examples of each really suck.

sushijerk · #3 04-27-2006, 10:18 AM

There is no way Pamela Anderson or Carmon Electra are "the best looking women on the planet." Neither of them are hotter than Eliza Dushku or the brunette from Rounders, they are just better publicized/more slutty.

Requiem1010 · #4 04-27-2006, 10:19 AM

There is a huge disparity between 6 and 7.

econophile · #5 04-27-2006, 10:20 AM

i think the example women are horrible choices

plus, better to have an illustrated guide

mak15 · #6 04-27-2006, 10:21 AM

i've always functioned under the idea that by definition a 5 is the ugliest girl you'd be fine about admiting to hooking up with sober. it's a good starting point for the scale and you go up or down from there.

4_2_it · #7 04-27-2006, 10:24 AM

Come on guys, it's a 3-point scale:

1) Never under any circumstance

2) If Drunk

3) Anytime

Rootabager · #8 04-27-2006, 10:42 AM

I use the a slightly different scale

4. You would bang her when drunk only if she was at your house

3. You would go somewhere else to bang her if you were drunk

2. You would bang her sober

1. You would take her out in public and show her off.

Tortuga · #9 04-27-2006, 10:46 AM

The brunette in Rounder's is Famke Janssen and she's definitely higher than a 9. This is because she does not have HEP-C and because she's not a total hoe.

irvman21 · #10 04-27-2006, 10:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
The brunette in Rounder's is Famke Janssen and she's definitely higher than a 9. This is because she does not have HEP-C and because she's not a total hoe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Famke Janssen's role as a post-op tranny on Nip/Tuck completely ruined her for me. No amount of telling myself it was just a TV show has helped at all.