#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT: Different structures...anyone interested?
Would anyone else really like for Stars to add some new SNG structures? They seem pretty open to appease customers, so I thought if several of us e-mailed, maybe they would try it out. They've added higher level turbos, and 180 man tourneys at the request of customers.
I'm thinking of things like: 1) Deep stacked SNG (maybe start with 3k chips)...wouldn't be my preference. 2) Winner takes all SNG ($10 tourney, 1st gets $100)...wouldn't play these personally, but I can imagine they'd get some play. 3) Flat payout SNG ($10 tourney, 1-5th get $20)...I'd love these, they would finish really fast (as soon as 5 people were eliminated), the variance would be almost non-existent. Any other ideas? Anyone like/hate this idea? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: Different structures...
No, I don't wanna take the fish out of my games!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: Different structures...anyone interested?
Bad idea, sorry.
Please stop ASAP. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: Different structures...anyone interested?
Personally, I excel at satellite structures and many people play them very poorly. For that reason, and the fact that they'd take less time to complete, I like #3.
#2 would be a very good plan for anyone that get's a high % of 1sts, but they wouldn't be very popular. #1 would have a much lower $/hr rate, and I don't think the reduced variance would make up for that. zip |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: Different structures...
[ QUOTE ]
No, I don't wanna take the fish out of my games! [/ QUOTE ] It could also mean that some sharks move to a different game. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: Different structures...anyone interested?
[ QUOTE ]
Personally, I excel at satellite structures and many people play them very poorly. For that reason, and the fact that they'd take less time to complete, I like #3. #2 would be a very good plan for anyone that get's a high % of 1sts, but they wouldn't be very popular. #1 would have a much lower $/hr rate, and I don't think the reduced variance would make up for that. zip [/ QUOTE ] I agree with your assessment of all of them. I think that fish could be attracted to each one, but definately #3 would be ideal for most people here. I'd love to see it implemented, although it's probably unlikely. The tournies would end very fast, and give PS some more rake/hr, so it could make sense for them also. I just played my first satellite MTT today (to the Sunday million), and happened to make it with very little effort, and it is mostly the reason I thought of this thread. #3 resembles a satellite, which seem to have a high profitablity expectation for players who adjust correctly. |
|
|