Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2007, 05:20 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Rundown Differences

What are the fundamental differences between different types of rundown hands?

For instance, the strength of

JT98 (full run)
4568 (top gap)
4678 (bottom gap)
4578 (middle gap)

That last hand is one of the main reasons I ask. It sure looks like a good rundown when someone has raised in front of me, but I have a feeling it is a lot less powerful than the other rundowns. Also, is there an inherent difference between the top gap and bottom gap hands.

And I don't give a [censored] if they're not called those things.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2007, 05:42 PM
iggymcfly iggymcfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,784
Default Re: Rundown Differences

The top gap is the worst because it's more likely to make non-nut wraps when it hits. I haven't analyzed the probabilities specifically or anything, but I do know that full run > bottom gap > middle gap > top gap.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:23 PM
TomCowley TomCowley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 354
Default Re: Rundown Differences

The top gap hands play a LOT worse when somebody could be in there with a similar hand, since it's a lot harder to flop nut draws on the high end. I'm going to change JT98 to 8765 so we don't run into the edge of the deck.

With 8765

234, 345, 346, 347, 456, 457, 458, 467, 468, 569, 579, 69T are the nuts (12)

679, 789, 79T, 89T, 9TJ aren't (5).

34, 45, 46, 47, 56, 57, 58 (7) are all monster flops (12+ outs to nut straight or boat) as well, plus plenty more strong flops with non-nut draws.

With 8764:

235, 345, 356, 357, 456, 457, 458, 569, 579, 69T (10) are the nuts

567, 568, 79T, 89T, 9TJ aren't (5).

35, 45, 56, 57, 58 (5) are monster flops

So 8764 is like a baby version of 8765. It just flops a little worse.

With 8754:

A23, 236, 346, 356, 367, 456, 467, 468, 569, 69T (10) are the nuts

567, 568, 678, 679, 689, JT9 (6) aren't

36, 46, 56 (3) are monster flops (and 67/68/69 are big to nonnut draws)

So you flop about the same for straights, but you only hit 60% of the nut draws.

With 8654:

A23, 234, 235, 236, 347, 357, 367, 457, 478, 579 (10) are the nuts

567, 678, 679, 789, 79T (5) aren't

23, 47 (2) are monster flops (57/67/78/79 have a ton of nonnut outs).


So if you just care about making a straight (say you give opp AAKK and are trying to crack it), the 3 gap hands are equivalent. If you're worried about someone else having cards in the same range, then drawing to the nuts is vital, and the bottom gap hand is MUCH better at flopping 2 cards that give strong nut draws and the top gap is clearly the worst. Top gap is much more of a trouble hand than bottom gap (and middle gap is in between). Note that flopping the strong draws is a better indicator of hand strength since you're much more likely to hit a 2-card combination on the flop (a draw) than a 3-card combination for a made straight.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:35 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: Rundown Differences

Exactly what I was looking for, thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.