Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2006, 03:35 PM
jmillerdls jmillerdls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,704
Default NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

Seems like he's blocking with a flush draw, and then just bluffing the river...but I get burned by calling river bets a lot, so I'm getting a bit gunshy. What do you guys think?

Also, how is the hand played up until there? Just call the turn maybe? Looking back, I'm guessing $4-5 on the flop would have been more appropriate.

Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
8 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (8 players) Hero is CO with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
2 folds, MP1 calls, MP2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $1.25</font>, Button folds, SB calls, BB folds, MP1 calls.

Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($4, 3 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">MP1 bets $1</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $3</font>, SB folds, MP1 calls.

Turn: T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($10, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">MP1 bets $1</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $6</font>, MP1 calls.

River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($22, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">MP1 is all-in $14.2</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2006, 03:42 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

Raise to $5 on the flop. I think I'd raise to about 11 on the turn, or depending on what villain has left, push the turn. I would call the river as it doesn't make sense why he wouldn't 3bet the turn with a very good hand. That two couldn't have helped him.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2006, 03:56 PM
Dave I Dave I is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

This is a monster or at least &gt; TPTK.

I have a same-bet theory. The theory goes when someone bets the same amount on two streets you should raise 100% of the time W/ATC. Especially on drawy boards. 95% of the time it is a weak hand/draw and they fold. If they call then lead big (big for them) like here, you are almost never ahead with just a pair.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:03 PM
jmillerdls jmillerdls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,704
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

[ QUOTE ]
This is a monster or at least &gt; TPTK.

I have a same-bet theory. The theory goes when someone bets the same amount on two streets you should raise 100% of the time W/ATC. Especially on drawy boards. 95% of the time it is a weak hand/draw and they fold. If they call then lead big (big for them) like here, you are almost never ahead with just a pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you are right, I folded...thinking along the same lines as what you wrote. However, after looking back on it, I started second guessing myself.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:04 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

[ QUOTE ]
This is a monster or at least &gt; TPTK.

I have a same-bet theory. The theory goes when someone bets the same amount on two streets you should raise 100% of the time W/ATC. Especially on drawy boards. 95% of the time it is a weak hand/draw and they fold. If they call then lead big (big for them) like here, you are almost never ahead with just a pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're saying villain is weak by betting small twice but then you're saying he has TPTK beat. What is it?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:08 PM
ChipStorm ChipStorm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Poker For Dogs
Posts: 2,584
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

Make a pot-sized raise on the flop, to $7. That flop is draw-heavy, and you're not pricing anyone out of anything with a $2 raise.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:13 PM
n1nj4.br n1nj4.br is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,571
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

push turn.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:15 PM
Dave I Dave I is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is a monster or at least &gt; TPTK.

I have a same-bet theory. The theory goes when someone bets the same amount on two streets you should raise 100% of the time W/ATC. Especially on drawy boards. 95% of the time it is a weak hand/draw and they fold. If they call then lead big (big for them) like here, you are almost never ahead with just a pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're saying villain is weak by betting small twice but then you're saying he has TPTK beat. What is it?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am saying that the vast, vast majority of the time he is weak when he makes that second small bet. We raise, he calls then leads big is included in the vast, vast minority of the time he is not weak. Make sense?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2006, 04:18 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: NL25 FR: Do I have to call this river?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is a monster or at least &gt; TPTK.

I have a same-bet theory. The theory goes when someone bets the same amount on two streets you should raise 100% of the time W/ATC. Especially on drawy boards. 95% of the time it is a weak hand/draw and they fold. If they call then lead big (big for them) like here, you are almost never ahead with just a pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're saying villain is weak by betting small twice but then you're saying he has TPTK beat. What is it?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am saying that the vast, vast majority of the time he is weak when he makes that second small bet. We raise, he calls then leads big is included in the vast, vast minority of the time he is not weak. Make sense?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.