Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:12 PM
Sibelius Sibelius is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 42
Default 33 spew or standard?

SB is a 35/25/1.5 over 65 hands

pf: hero is CO 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
hero raises, btn folds, SB 3-bets, bb folds, hero calls

flop: 4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
SB bets, hero raises, SB calls

turn: T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
SB checks hero bets, SB calls

river: J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
SB checks, hero bets, SB folds
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:42 PM
OGGambler OGGambler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 11
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

Interesting hand, I would play the same except the river in which I may want to just check. It is a card that may hit villains range here and it would suck to get c/r. Also I think he is calling with anything that has you beat. I want to see what others have to say about it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:53 PM
numbnuts007 numbnuts007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

pf, flop and turn are good. River is probably okay, this is just a very thin value bet. We have to be putting him almost exactly on AK or AQ for this to be correct, yes? I guess maybe we can fold out 33, 55-88 but he's likely to be calling with those hands and almost certainly a 9, T, or J. I think i'm checking behind this river, though i'm open to criticism about it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:12 PM
Burnsabre Burnsabre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chancellor of the Exechequer of Valuetown
Posts: 476
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

I'm gonna throw it out there that I hate this river bet. Not many people call down with A high after this action with every draw at least having a pair, so there is no value in the bet. As for folding a better hand, I could see folding a 4 or 55-88 here, but I doubt that he has one of these hands AND folds this hand to be profitable enough.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:15 PM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 715
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

If I was villain I would fold A-high on that river. So I think this is a case where, if you get called, you lose. Was it supposed to be a value bet, or a bluff?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2007, 08:05 PM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

preflop through turn is standard imo. the river is really close though. Since the main draw got there on the turn a LAGTAG should be less likely to SD A high here which would make checking correct. That being said a lot of LAGTAGs play bad and this guy might be one of them who is auto showing down A high which would make a bet likely correct. I think I'd lean toward checking here and adjusting for the future is he shows up with Ax (no heart for example)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2007, 06:02 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: 33 spew or standard?

Is the flop raise standard?

I guess we're ahead of his range, but when we're not villain will always pwn us with a turn c/r.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.