Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who would make a better STTF Mod?
Omahahaha 3 15.79%
My butt hole 16 84.21%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:20 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

LESSON 1A: The Limp Resteal

This ties in with the initial resteal lesson and is much more valuable at fullring but occassionally comes up at 6max.

Alot of this comes from the Slotboom method for shortstacking PLO that he mentioned in his book, Secrets of Professional Pot Limit Holdem. Also of note is a recent Diebitter observation in a thread in this forum (sorry--no linky--just recall from memory) that many shortstackers at fullring seem to be limping mid pairs and Ace-big hands upfront to push over a late position raise.

Often, you'll be upfront in a game and there will be an aggressive limper/blind stealer left to act after you, especially at higher limits. Here, you can take a chance of limping and hoping to have the opportunity to shove over that late aggressor's likely light raise.

One, even with a shortstack, it's not fun to play pots OOP.

Two, a raise from you upfront will make it less likely for a late aggressor to reraise as he should know you are pot-committed with an awful large range of your initial raising range.

Three, the math is very similar and you should already have some good training.

Four, in fullring games you often gain the benefit of additional dead money with limpers inbetween you and the light raiser and/or a weak blind call of the late position raiser.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:15 PM
Makonnen Makonnen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 226
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

Isn't shortstacking specifically dependent on LAG opponents? If so, this is just another turn of the screw in the development of the game, and I wonder if part of the discussion of PFR in Renton's thread comes into play: that is, does the presence of shortstacking mean that limpylimpy becomes a more crucial part of the game?

Also, LOL at the ChickenLittleSkyIsFallingDon'tRevealTheSecret content.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:19 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't shortstacking specifically dependent on LAG opponents? If so, this is just another turn of the screw in the development of the game, and I wonder if part of the discussion of PFR in Renton's thread comes into play: that is, does the presence of shortstacking mean that limpylimpy becomes a more crucial part of the game?

Also, LOL at the ChickenLittleSkyIsFallingDon'tRevealTheSecret content.

[/ QUOTE ]

if someone isn't blind stealing 30% of the time, it better be because a competent shortstacker is in one of the blinds

it's more than LAGs, it hurts aggressive poker in general because they lose at the game of chicken
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:20 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
MT2R: You're a [censored] idiot. I'm sick of you idiots posting info about shortstacking to try and get attention. You're not good. You're not cool. You're probably not even a winning shortstacker at decent limits. Shut. the. [censored]. up.

[/ QUOTE ]


Okay, Kurosh can take a day off to cool his boots.

Next one gets 2 days, and so on and so forth.

db

[/ QUOTE ]


why is this banworthy?
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:24 PM
Makonnen Makonnen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 226
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

[ QUOTE ]
if someone isn't blind stealing 30% of the time, it better be because a competent shortstacker is in one of the blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]
But that shouldn't be a source of fear. In fact, it should be pretty exploitable, since the SS range is absolutely predictable, right?

This is part of the evolution where I think FR players do have an edge: SS don't have a lot of room for error in their play--if they deviate much at all from the strict math, the pendulum swings back. So, if you know someone is a skilled SS, you should be able to figure out their range almost exactly, and given the amount of $ that will be in the pot once they shove back over you, your calling range isn't all that thin, no?
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:27 PM
carol-ann carol-ann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 227
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

just complain to your sites you play at about shortstacking

write them e-mails, explain how they ruin the enjoyment of the game for both regulars and fish

threaten to take your business elsewhere
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:53 PM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
MT2R: You're a [censored] idiot. I'm sick of you idiots posting info about shortstacking to try and get attention. You're not good. You're not cool. You're probably not even a winning shortstacker at decent limits. Shut. the. [censored]. up.

[/ QUOTE ]


Okay, Kurosh can take a day off to cool his boots.

Next one gets 2 days, and so on and so forth.

db

[/ QUOTE ]


why is this banworthy?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're joking, right?
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:55 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
MT2R: You're a [censored] idiot. I'm sick of you idiots posting info about shortstacking to try and get attention. You're not good. You're not cool. You're probably not even a winning shortstacker at decent limits. Shut. the. [censored]. up.

[/ QUOTE ]


Okay, Kurosh can take a day off to cool his boots.

Next one gets 2 days, and so on and so forth.

db

[/ QUOTE ]


why is this banworthy?

[/ QUOTE ]

mainly because it is massive trolling IMO

he's a shorstacker who I datamined to learn many things and once claimed he could ruin online poker by posting his guide to shortstacking yet calls out another poster for being an attention whore because that poster is actually sharing information

my guess is he thinks his bucket is being stolen, but I don't want this thread to devolve into personal attacks now that information is actually coming out. So, I apologize and really have no idea why Kurosh is so against my posts.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:57 PM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

Questions for the teacher:

If we're constantly limp/pushing with our 20bb stack, isn't the LAG going to pick up on this and not raise when we enter the pot?

Are we ever limp/folding? If so, what kind of situations are we doing it in and with what hands?

On a personal note, why did you stop shortstacking?

EDIT: One more. Do you reload back to 20bb if you fall below? If not, why not?
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:57 PM
Ulkis Ulkis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 309
Default Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread

I hope this thread gets locked soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.