Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-04-2007, 06:17 PM
szw szw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,348
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It makes me vomit that I bought WYNN at 35 and thought I was doing good by selling at 70.

[/ QUOTE ]

I almost bought Wynn during the summer after hearing countless stories in the pooker room of people droping six figures in blackjack.. Bob Safai was one of these story tellers. Would have made a quickl 20-30% profit. DOH!

[/ QUOTE ]

HOT TIP!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-04-2007, 06:29 PM
StuckaRack StuckaRack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 99
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

Today it closed at 150. I did'nt realize it had gotten so high, but don't feel bad.
I bought Qualcom in 98' at 45 and quickly sold at 65. In 2000 it had a stock split adjusted price of 800.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:03 PM
CardSharpCook CardSharpCook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: kingputtlv
Posts: 7,328
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

[ QUOTE ]
Today it closed at 150. I did'nt realize it had gotten so high, but don't feel bad.
I bought Qualcom in 98' at 45 and quickly sold at 65. In 2000 it had a stock split adjusted price of 800.

[/ QUOTE ]

QCOM's current value is about 1/4 of its 2000 peak.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:11 PM
wiper wiper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,423
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

which is still 135 higher than he sold it for...

poor 55% growth!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:33 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If it really is just shifting money from one casino to another and not attracting the number of new gamblers they had predicted then it will be in trouble because of the financing arrangements. If they don't hit their expected returns then they will have trouble paying back the interest on the notes. The investors will not want to use other means to pay this back.

[/ QUOTE ]

So investors would rather get no money than money from a different casino? Investors are weird!

[/ QUOTE ]

Smart investors try not to throw more money into a foundering investment. I'm not saying this is the case here, just pointing out that not hitting stated targets has repercussions. Bonds get lower ratings, which means the investments are are worth less. Lower rating means higher interest rates on the notes. It all can add up and snowball very quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2007, 08:48 PM
StuckaRack StuckaRack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 99
Default Re: WYNN\'S A LOSER - China

I actually miscalculated. I sold QCOM at 65 on 1-20-99.

QCOM split 2:1 5-11-99, then split 4:1 12-31-99, so I would have had 8 shares for every 1.

And when QCOM hit its all time high 1-3-2000 at $200 every $65 share I sold was worth $1600.
Oh well, wont even get into the fact I had alot of MSFT in 1986 for a few months.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.