Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2007, 02:40 PM
West West is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,504
Default media objectivity (repost w/commentary)

I was trying to add some commentary to my post only to get the reply rejected because the thread was locked.

link to the blog

I thought this particular blog was compelling because what he is saying about how mainstream media journalists are behaving is both true and important:

"All of this is the by-product of the well-documented and much-discussed journalistic myth that "objectivity" requires mindless recitation of both sides's claims, and that it is improper and "biased" to take sides. But as the Times article above documents [on the Iranian President and his statements regarding the Holocaust], objectivity and meaningful journalism often requires taking sides, particularly where one side is making objectively false statements."

later

"An adversarial process is designed to uncover deceit and falsehood by ensuring that claims and arguments are subjected to meaningful scrutiny by some opposing force. An adversarial press means that it views its function as a watchdog over the Government, as a check on its power. It fulfills that function by viewing Government statements and actions skeptically and with the intent to scrutinize them and determine their truth, rather than mindlessly convey what the Government asserts. It means that there is a difference between a free press and Pravda."

and also very relevant:

"And, via Capt in Comments, here is Justice Hugo Black's Concurring Opinion in New York Times v. U.S. (the Pentagon Papers case) (emphasis added):

In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government.

The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell."

There are some exceptions still, but that description of the core function to be performed by the press is indescribably distant from what the press actually does."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2007, 01:32 PM
JackWhite JackWhite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,554
Default Re: media objectivity (repost w/commentary)

You can be happy now. NBC news will now feature regular commentaries on the evening news by Keith Olbermann, as well as giving him a couple of primetime specials. In addition, NBC news new politics director used to work for Democratic Senator Tom Harkin.

I say about time. After all the reporters who used to work for Republicans in the mainstream media, it is good to see a Democrat get a chance. If only they'd give him his own show. Maybe a Sunday morning show to give some balance.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.