Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-20-2007, 03:19 AM
Mickey Brausch Mickey Brausch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,209
Default GHWB

[ QUOTE ]
Are you stating that West or anyone else would find in [the Jimmy Carter book about the Middle East conflict] the makings of an insightful rendition of Middle East history?

[/ QUOTE ]I'd state that the book signifies a shift in the posture of American attitudes towards the Middle East, a very slight but still significant shift. Criticism of Israeli policies are not often encountered in American domestic politics and the life of a politician has been known to suffer quite strongly whenever he is perceived by the media or the various PACs to be "anti-Israel". This is a book by an ex-president who places some of the blame for the ongoing bloody impasse on "our side" as well and not exclusively on the Palestinians and the Arabs; and that's noteworthy.

By the way, this is a book that, comfortably, could have been written by George H.W. Bush.

But his son is president.

Mickey Brausch
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-20-2007, 11:51 AM
West West is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,504
Default Wikipedia

Wikipedia link, lot to read here
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-20-2007, 10:25 PM
HeavilyArmed HeavilyArmed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Set over set mining .01-.02
Posts: 1,065
Default Re: Reading Jimmy Carter\'s new book on the Middle East

Washington Post review

None too favorable.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-20-2007, 11:52 PM
West West is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,504
Default Re: Reading Jimmy Carter\'s new book on the Middle East

Personally, I don't see a lot of substance in that article.

Edit: for the record, that's from the editorial page - calling it a "Washington Post review" is a bit misleading.

She's criticizing Carter for not talking about the holocaust??

"by almost ignoring the Holocaust, Carter gives inadvertent comfort to those who deny its importance or even its historical reality, in part because it helps them deny Israel's right to exist"

This is just ridiculously unfair, IMO.

So is bringing up Darfur to criticize Carter for something he said on television. If he called conditions for Palestinians "one of the worst examples of human rights deprivation", the existence of other, worse human rights situations does not make his statement false, obviously. Honestly, is this the best she's got against him??

Then she just gives a list of individuals (all apparently Jewish) who have criticized the book, and closes by saying "others can enumerate the numerous factual errors in the book". Evidently she can't.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-21-2007, 04:06 PM
Felix_Nietzsche Felix_Nietzsche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 3,593
Default Trying to Learn Foreign Policy from Jimmy Carter.....

.....is like trying to learn to be rich from a guy who has been bankrupt 10 times.
Jimmy should have stuck with pounding nails for Habitat for Humanity.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-21-2007, 06:18 PM
Mickey Brausch Mickey Brausch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,209
Default The Man From I.K.E.A.

[ QUOTE ]

Jimmy Carter should have stuck with pounding nails for Habitat for Humanity.

[/ QUOTE ]Felix, your saving grace is honesty.

Humor it ain't.

Sincerely, etc
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.