#1
|
|||
|
|||
50NL: QQ oop
Utg is 16/6/1 over about 700 hands. CO is 27/7 over 54 i am not worried about him though. PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Button ($205.70) Hero ($74.05) BB ($62.40) UTG ($50) MP ($50.15) CO ($20.80) Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $2</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $2, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $7.5</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG calls $5.50, CO calls $5.50. Flop: ($23) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> Hero checks, UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets $13.3 (All-In)</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $61.75</font>, I think my play is not good here. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: QQ oop
why are you not cbetting this flop?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: QQ oop
[ QUOTE ]
why are you not cbetting this flop? [/ QUOTE ] I felt i was behind UTG and checked. i didn't think the hand through very well, at the time. i should have CB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: QQ oop
You felt you were behind UTG (why?), but isolate the shortstack by moving AI?!
You put yourself in bad relative position, because you have to decide first after the shortstack moving AI. I prolly just call the AI bet and don't invest any more $$'s in the pot. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: QQ oop
Yes pushing was bad. maybe i should have changed my action for more interesting discussion.
Utg is tight and not very agressive. I think his pf calling range is QQ+, AK?, and sometimes lower Pocket pairs but i don't know if he raises them utg. 22+ AK is 7.1% of all hands. his pf raise total is 6. If i call and utg shoves i should fold. If i cbet flop and utg raises i fold, if he calls i shut down of turn. any other lines? or are these wrong. |
|
|