#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
Cmon guys, a passive player with 0.4 AF is not going to raise all in here with less then AA/kk or set, he is not even betting a fd/sd here.
Unless he was thrown around like a little bitch lately and op is one of the active players at the table, but this thing should be mentioned in "reads" imo. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
[ QUOTE ]
Call. Donks show do this with stupid [censored] all the time, regardless of stack size. [/ QUOTE ] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
[ QUOTE ]
Cmon guys, a passive player with 0.4 AF is not going to raise all in here with less then AA/kk or set, he is not even betting a fd/sd here. Unless he was thrown around like a little bitch lately and op is one of the active players at the table, but this thing should be mentioned in "reads" imo. [/ QUOTE ] I think villain has AA or KK a lot here. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
is it fair to say that in general someone this passive isn't even going to be pushing big draws? i was thinking AA KK when i called.
i think there is a section in the psychology if poker that talks about this type of player and how they like to see cards and see what other people have, thus they are v passive and dont really think about Fold ev with big draws or folding out tp weak kicker etc. i hadn't seen villain push any draws and from his stats i dont think its in his range tbh [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
[ QUOTE ]
Dont go broke in unraised pots [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, poker is such an undynamic and unsituational spot we should always go by retardedly broad statements. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Dont go broke in unraised pots [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, poker is such an undynamic and unsituational spot we should always go by retardedly broad statements. [/ QUOTE ] lol, thanks, was going to post the same sentiment, but Jay being the voice of reason beat me to it. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
Yeah take my words out of context, what i meant is we didnt put much money in pot + opponent is very passive so given most optimistic range (imo) we are favourite 57% of the time.
Im a hero caller and im folding this if table plays normaly ofc. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
hh is screwed... how did villain bet first? I guess you checked; w/e. I still cannot fold top two in a limped pot- even VERy passive players will go nuts here with an overpair, tho not too many of them open limp the button with them (tho with these stats I wouldn't be surprised). I still felt this here to be honest; I'd say his massive overbet shoulve would probably indicate he has QQ-AA and just wants to get it all in here and not gamble with Jx or draws or somethin- he doesn't realize u have t2. If anyone overshoves a set here, even someone ridic passive, I'd be shocked. Slowplayed overpair is definitely more of his range than a set here. Jus don't fold in this spot- cooooler
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
He could have a weaker 2 pair, sth stupid. Iam insta calling and happy with it!
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top 2 vs Passive player going nuts
just call. the times he has KK+ more than outweigh when he has a set
|
|
|