Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Where would you be willing to go for this?
East Coast ONLY 22 27.50%
West Coast ONLY 23 28.75%
I'd probably go to either (though I may grumble about one or the other) 17 21.25%
I probably won't go either way 18 22.50%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2006, 08:30 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Grade the October Magazine

After a couple months as editor of the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine, the Magazine is coming close to taking the shape I want it to. So, whether you like what's been published or not, now is an optimal time to have your voice heard about the direction of the Magazine.

I have two notes about the October issue.

1. The Developing and Using Reads in Heads-up No-limit Hold 'em article is remarkably long and is being counted as a double article. That's why there are only eleven titles in the index rather than the twelve you can expect each month.

2. The fantasy football article is delayed to possibly as late as Tuesday. With October 1st falling on a Sunday, the NFL schedule wasn't very accomodating.

I break down the October issue like this

Strategy Articles- 7
Heads-up Limit Hold 'em: A Basic Strategy
Developing and Using Reads in Heads-up No-limit Hold 'em
Counting Outs in Deuce-to-Seven Lowball
How to Win With Big Pairs in Stud Eight or Better
Chips Changing Value in Tournaments
Using a Read to Delay a Raise

General Poker- 2
Bankroll Requirements for Poker
Classic Article: On Tilt

Poker and Other Fields- 1
Poker and Finance Part 3

Non-poker Gamlbing- 2
Maximizing Value in Free Plays at Sportsbooks
Fantasy Football Part 2


I consider the strengths of this issue to be the articles by Richard Elks, Mark Gritter, and Brandon Reiser.

Developing and Using Reads in Heads-up No-limit Hold 'em
Counting Outs in Deuce-to-Seven Lowball
How to Win With Big Pairs in Stud Eight or Better

Not only were they very strong articles but they also provided the type of diversity which I'm hoping to be the norm in the future.

Unfortunately, I have received hardly any full ring game hold 'em articles since I became editor. As a result, we are without a full-ring game NLHE article for the second month in a row. My general rule of thumb is that should hold any issue back from getting into the A's.

I'm also a little dissapointed we don't have a Poker Journalism article. I'd like to see at least one of those in every issue.

My Grade: B+
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2006, 01:42 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I can hold my breath longer than the Boob
Posts: 10,311
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Dynasty,

I've only read a couple articles so far but the issue looks very good. But regarding style, the gray background of the articles blows hard and is more difficult to read. You can still change it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2006, 03:30 PM
MarkGritter MarkGritter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,376
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Editing: I didn't like the formatting. The minimum width of the window required to read the articles was too large. The black-on-gray is readable for me but not great.

Strategy Articles: I thought these articles were pretty solid, although I didn't feel that I learned a whole lot. The "Developing and Using Reads" article was particularly interesting; I would love to see more articles that explain a series of hands instead of just one or two. The Stud/8 article is very solid, but I think it should address multiway situations as well, since high hands become even trickier to play when there are more than one players going low in the pot.

Sklanksy's article made me think a bit more about how I approach short-stack situations but I really haven't come to any solid conclusions.

General poker/Poker and other fields: Mason's article was thought-provoking. Poker and Finance 3 had some interesting ideas but not as much depth as I would like. The Bankroll Requirements article I found somewhat light, and felt that its content could have been included in the previous article (where I found the mathematical derivation interesting) or in the promised 3rd article.

Other gambling: Not of much interest to me, though King Yao's article looks solid and presents a nonintuitive and probably valuable result.

I'm giving it a B- due to the HTML issues; contentwise I think it's a B or B+.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:06 AM
jfk jfk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,313
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Heads-up Limit Hold 'em: A Basic Strategy
-quite a good read. Glad to have the author back in the fold.

Developing and Using Reads in Heads-up No-limit Hold 'em
-I enjoyed this sort of analysis in HOH but it doesn't wear quite as well when an author is reviewing his own play. A reader might see a degree of self congratulations in an article such as this. This may detract from the lesson.

Counting Outs in Deuce-to-Seven Lowball
-outstanding breakdown and as good an article as I can recall on 27 LB, but I haven't seen this game spread or played in the last decade. Is the HORSE type revival bringing it back? These articles have a place in the magazine and are a good read but at a personal level not particularly relevent.

How to Win With Big Pairs in Stud Eight or Better
-didn't give it a fair read. Visceral reaction to the first read is that it is well done and I'm glad to see that this game is experiencing a comeback.

Chips Changing Value in Tournaments
-very useful considerations.

Using a Read to Delay a Raise
-disagreed with the author's conclusion and approach to the hand.

Bankroll Requirements for Poker
-always enjoy contributions from this author. His writings at 2+2 are a tremendous asset to the site.

Classic Article: On Tilt
-normally I'm a sucker for Mason's contributions but this one was a little flat. It contributed nothing new. This is the sort of area where Feeney really excelled and it would be fantastic to see new material from him. Describing caricatures of players on tilt and extracting lessons is fairly straightforward. This subject needs to be handled with subtlety and depth.

Poker and Finance Part 3
-much like the McCauley series, the ideas are thought provoking, educational and have application away from the table.

Maximizing Value in Free Plays at Sportsbooks
-interesting, well written and very easily understood. Always enjoy contributions from King Yao. At a personal level it had virtually no use other than general interest.

Fantasy Football Part 2
-not yet posted and am uninterested in fanatsy football. This is where 2+2 might consider drawing the line if there are other (poker) articles available to fill the void.

B-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2006, 09:30 AM
jzpiano jzpiano is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 2,385
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Not your best magazine, some of the articles were good, but a couple seemed like that were slapped together last minute. The NL article had a lot of thought and theory behind it. Sklansky's article althought I don't agree with 100% was good because it was a new idea.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2006, 11:06 AM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gibbering incoherently
Posts: 5,805
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

[ QUOTE ]
Editing: I didn't like the formatting. The minimum width of the window required to read the articles was too large. The black-on-gray is readable for me but not great.

[/ QUOTE ]

I couldn't agree more with this. I have a big monitor at home to play poker on but I often read these articles at work on a much smaller one. The side scrolling necessary on a 1024x768 resolution is totally unacceptable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2006, 12:34 PM
sputum sputum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Veni, vidi, badi beati
Posts: 826
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Copy the text and paste it into whatever floats your boat.
I liked this month's magazine a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:24 PM
cts cts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

Good god the HU NLHE article was awful. Ever think of getting someone with some real high stakes HU NLHE experience rather than some 4-year old that is buying in for 25BBs and open limping the SB with 72o?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2006, 02:34 PM
MarkGritter MarkGritter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,376
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

[ QUOTE ]

Counting Outs in Deuce-to-Seven Lowball
-outstanding breakdown and as good an article as I can recall on 27 LB, but I haven't seen this game spread or played in the last decade. Is the HORSE type revival bringing it back? These articles have a place in the magazine and are a good read but at a personal level not particularly relevent.


[/ QUOTE ]

Hi, jfk.

There is a fairly active community of triple draw players in the games offered at UltimateBet. The micros and biggest games are nearly always running.

Live triple draw is making its way into some of the midlimit mixed games in Southern California and Vegas (at least that is my understanding), but otherwise live games appears only at the $100/200+ level in a mix such as Badugi/Omaha/Triple Draw (BOT).

Single draw no-limit 2-7 was offered for a while by GamesGrid, but the cash games didn't really take off. There is still a regularly scheduled NL2-7 tournament.

Both variants are fun; come over to the Other Poker forum if you want pointers on getting started in them.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2006, 03:15 PM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gibbering incoherently
Posts: 5,805
Default Re: Grade the October Magazine

[ QUOTE ]
Good god the HU NLHE article was awful. Ever think of getting someone with some real high stakes HU NLHE experience rather than some 4-year old that is buying in for 25BBs and open limping the SB with 72o?

[/ QUOTE ]

My first thought on this article was along those lines, too. There are a couple things in there that I felt were just flat out wrong. For example,

[ QUOTE ]
2. There are certain types of opponent where it is not necessarily advantageous to be deep-stacked. The most obvious is the hyper-aggressive maniac: it is very difficult to tell when this type of player is betting with a real hand and when he is bluffing, and so you will often have to make raises and calls with marginal hands.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.