Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2007, 05:11 PM
Laetus Laetus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,005
Default NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP

Info about villain:

Villain is running 22/17/6.4 (Sample size ~300 hands) and he 3-bets pretty light. No other reads.

Please comment on this:

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Should we 4-bet PF, due to he is 3-betting light? Or should we call and let him "hang" himself with his aggression?

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] How should we play the flop? Bet and hope he raise? Check and call? Or check raise?

[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] How should we play the turn after our actual flop play?

EverestPoker Game #1412070326: Table Suva-22 - $1.00/$2.00 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:15:51 - 2007/04/18
Seat 1: HERO ($414.90)
Seat 2: SoNo41 ($205.20)
Seat 4: Macspower ($259.75)
Seat 5: Zopopop ($334.58)
Seat 6: kurtkatt9 ($561.97)
Zopopop posts the small blind of $1.00
kurtkatt9 posts the big blind of $2.00
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO[Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]]
HERO raises to $7.00
SoNo41 raises to $24.00
Zopopop folds
kurtkatt9 folds
HERO calls $17.00
*** FLOP *** [9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]]
HERO checks
SoNo41 bets $39.00
HERO calls $39.00
*** TURN *** [9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] [K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]]
HERO checks
SoNo41 bets $75.00
HERO ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2007, 06:59 PM
Jugador Jugador is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 110
Default Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP

Personally, I'm about 50/50 between a 4-bet and a call preflop. With villain's aggression at 6.4 you can definitely squeeze more money out of him with his frequent continuation bets.

I like a flop check-raise over the other options since you are out of position.

The King on the turn sucks, you've played the hand so passively and given him the opportunity to put you in a position that commits your effective stack with that call.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2007, 07:07 PM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP

i could go either way pre-flop, but since decided to just call, now you have to c/r the flop.

as played, fold the turn. you might be ahead but you're basically just taking a shot in the dark if you call because you've been passive the whole what.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2007, 01:30 PM
Laetus Laetus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,005
Default Re: NL200 - QQ against aggressive TAG in 3-betted pot OOP

Yes, I should have check-raised the flop, dunno why I didn't... maybe I was hoping for a blank and then CR on turn. :P

I think the turn is a fold as you guys, hence I folded.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.