Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:28 PM
RapidEvolution RapidEvolution is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Grinding 50NL?
Posts: 936
Default 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

I have MP3 at 9/6/0 over 45 hands (not much)
BTN is 28/18/3 over same sample


$0.25/$0.5 No Limit Holdem
9 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG (<font color="#0000cc">$60.40</font>)
UTG+1 (<font color="#0000cc">$42.10</font>)
MP1 (<font color="#0000cc">$49.40</font>)
MP2 (<font color="#0000cc">$44.00</font>)
MP3 (<font color="#0000cc">$56.95</font>)
Hero (<font color="#0000cc">$50.00</font>)
BTN (<font color="#0000cc">$56.25</font>)
SB (<font color="#0000cc">$84.35</font>)
BB (<font color="#0000cc">$49.25</font>)

Pre-flop: ($0.75, 9 players) Hero is CO Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="#777777">4 folds</font>, <font color="#cc0000">MP3 raises to $1.75</font>, Hero calls $1.75, <font color="#cc0000">BTN raises to $3</font>, <font color="#777777">2 folds</font>, MP3 calls $1.25, Hero calls $1.25

With position on the initial raiser, I elect to flat with QJs. After the minraise by the button and MP3's call, I'm looking at huge odds to call here, so I do. Also, if button moves first on flop, I can see what MP3 does before doing anything.

With the raise and call, I think BTN's minraise is either in the range of QQ+/AK or some random weird hand.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($9.75, 3 players)
MP3 checks, Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">BTN bets $9.75</font>, <font color="#777777">MP3 folds</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero goes all-in $47

I pushed here to maximize FE against and AQ/AK type hand, fold out the higher pairs, and get it in, in case he minraised with some weird sc hand. If he's here with AA, I still have outs to draw out to. Is my reasoning okay here?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:41 PM
Johnes Benjamin Johnes Benjamin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 3rd & Delaware
Posts: 848
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

I don't think you have much FE vs an A, as your hand looks pretty drawy, but sc's are also a big part of his range. If there is a chance he will call with 67s then it would be pretty good.

I am usually wary of a minraise but whatevs, it is fine I guess
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:44 PM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

LOL at having FE over AK/AQ.

You probably get KK to fold though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:55 PM
sakrei sakrei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 178
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

so is this line ok?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:25 PM
wikemang wikemang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 648
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

This is definitely spew. I don't see how you have fold equity here against an ace.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:28 PM
RapidEvolution RapidEvolution is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Grinding 50NL?
Posts: 936
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

Okay assuming that villain is willing to stack off with only TP here, does the chance to fold out other high pairs not create the equity we need to make this +EV?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:45 PM
toymach776 toymach776 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the set mine
Posts: 324
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

You definitely dont have fold equity here. I also dont think that your draw is strong enough. Its a non nut flush draw with no gutshot or overs. Insufficent fold equity or pot equity makes this spew IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:38 PM
ClubChamp04 ClubChamp04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 624
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

I don't like the play and agree with everyone in that you have no fold equity vs AK-AQ. I would prob CC one street here with the expectation of extracting value from someone who doesn't want to fold if we hit our hand.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2007, 12:19 AM
twilitekid twilitekid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 60
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

with so many people over valuing their hands @ 50, i'm beginning to wonder if semi-bluffing all in isn't always spewing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-30-2007, 12:22 AM
Chargers In 07 Chargers In 07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DERB of Micro/Small stakes
Posts: 1,383
Default Re: 50NL: Is a semi-bluff spew here?

[ QUOTE ]
with so many people over valuing their hands @ 50, i'm beginning to wonder if semi-bluffing all in isn't always spewing.

[/ QUOTE ]Depends on how many outs you have and their range.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.