Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded

View Poll Results: Which QB?
Matt Hasselbeck (Seneca Wallace) at Broncos 4 33.33%
Chad Pennington at Packers 8 66.67%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:14 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*

[ QUOTE ]
I have a noob question regarding pf. What are people 3 betting with in the sb against this utg raiser? 77+ ats+ ajo+ kqs+?


[/ QUOTE ]

For me with an unknown BB:

55, A8s, ATo, KJs, KQo

Tighten up with a loose BB of course
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:18 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*

I am certainly not trying to rub anyones anus the wrong way here.

But where I come from I see the WA/WB line like once every 20k hands. Villain just doesnt have Tx here. I dont care how unrealistic it is for him to c/r/c 77, 88, 99, JJ, AK, AQ it is more unrealistic for him to have Tx.


This spot is different simply because villain is an unknown as presented to me, and making the decision solely based on his stats I worry a helluva lot more about the rivered trips given his weakish TAG looking stats
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:20 AM
vmacosta vmacosta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,060
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
Yes but I doubt he would cap even AT given stats. The crux of my argument was I can't see this guy not sticking in a raise on flop or turn given two flush draws on the turn and top pair with no face cards out. Plus Joe is a statistical LAG if the guy has any stats.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's my problem with the argument of everybody in the 3b camp:

If you think he always raises top pair on flop or turn, why do you think he would play 99 so differently? If JJ and Jts are virtually the same hand (and I disagree, but whatever), then how is 99 any different? And 77 picked up a gutshot on the turn, so I'd expect him to raise that hand there pretty damn often. So I honestly don't really get it--I'd 3b QQ sometimes too, but that would be against a 50/40 type who might raise/call KQ. Against a normal tag I don't see how this isn't just a cross-your-fingers call. I think you win a fair amount here only cuz I think he has a retarded blluff-raise a fair amount here.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:46 AM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
Your opponent:
3253 hands
29.17/18.8/1.54
F: 2.0
T: 1.3
R: 0.98
WTSD: 43.5%
W$SD: 55.25%


5/$10 Limit Hold'em - 5 players
Hand Converter Tool from DeucesCracked.com

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="#FF0000">UTG raises</font>, CO folds, Button folds, <font color="#FF0000">Hero 3-bets</font>, BB folds, UTG calls.

Flop: (7.00 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#FF0000">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

Turn: (4.50 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#FF0000">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls.

River: (6.50 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#FF0000">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#FF0000">UTG raises</font>

Your call button is now broken.

[/ QUOTE ]


this thread is retarded.

"lets make a poll where the only correct answer is an answer you cannot choose"

since call in not an option, I vote 3bet/fold to a cap.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:51 AM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*

[ QUOTE ]
I am certainly not trying to rub anyones anus the wrong way here.

But where I come from I see the WA/WB line like once every 20k hands. Villain just doesnt have Tx here. I dont care how unrealistic it is for him to c/r/c 77, 88, 99, JJ, AK, AQ it is more unrealistic for him to have Tx.


This spot is different simply because villain is an unknown as presented to me, and making the decision solely based on his stats I worry a helluva lot more about the rivered trips given his weakish TAG looking stats

[/ QUOTE ]


oink.

I'm a 26/18/2.0 I will have Tx here about always.

To think someone can't have Tx is just plain wrong.

What's this guy's most likely hand? Tx or air.

He is folding air and capping Tx.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:54 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*

Hip

I know

But I wasnt talking about playing with you but the regs in my games.

For some reason its the people with AF &lt; 1 that thinks its reasonable for villain to have Tx here [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:06 AM
vmacosta vmacosta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,060
Default Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*

[ QUOTE ]
Hence why the single AF/WTSD stats are the most important factor.

[/ QUOTE ]

Those stats are generally difficult to interpret and converge slowly. Look at this guy's w$sd--looks like he's running hot in JoeTall's sample and that's prob why his wsd is so high too.

I'd much rather just recall a single hand where he raised thin on the river or have a general feeling he wants my chips more than other people's (which may very well be the case, i dunno).
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:10 AM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DeucesCracked - Serious Game
Posts: 6,426
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes but I doubt he would cap even AT given stats. The crux of my argument was I can't see this guy not sticking in a raise on flop or turn given two flush draws on the turn and top pair with no face cards out. Plus Joe is a statistical LAG if the guy has any stats.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's my problem with the argument of everybody in the 3b camp:

If you think he always raises top pair on flop or turn, why do you think he would play 99 so differently? If JJ and Jts are virtually the same hand (and I disagree, but whatever), then how is 99 any different? And 77 picked up a gutshot on the turn, so I'd expect him to raise that hand there pretty damn often. So I honestly don't really get it--I'd 3b QQ sometimes too, but that would be against a 50/40 type who might raise/call KQ. Against a normal tag I don't see how this isn't just a cross-your-fingers call. I think you win a fair amount here only cuz I think he has a retarded blluff-raise a fair amount here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well sure, that's true, I'd raise for value with 22 on this flop if I was in there somehow preflop but I doubt the villain in question would. So I guess the question is how does someone with stats like those perceive the value of his hand changing between the turn and river. It is my contention if he has a smaller pair than a ten (A6, 77, whatever) he is going to see the ten as a good card, and what was previously a tenuous situation for him ("I could beat by a ten or an overpair here") has now become somewhat better ("now a ten is not very likely") so he perceives his hand value has increased. Nobody here can say they generally are not happy to see the top card pair when they were worried about their opponent having top pair. It's certainly a welcome sight most times.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-28-2007, 05:31 AM
Raist0000 Raist0000 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 59
Default Re: MORE POLLS

I agree with Miles and his posts, and I think too that 3betting is very bad.

It's even worse if we look at his river AF &lt; 1. I mean, I highly doubt that this opponent can make thin river value raises, and even if it's a thin value raise this time, he has to call your 3bet yet to have any value.

This is a ten a high percentage of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:42 AM
MitchL MitchL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,712
Default Re: MORE POLLS

Nothing about villains line makes any sense which means I will never fold, but I would rather miss 1bb of value when I am ahead than lose 2bb extra when I am behind.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.