Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded

View Poll Results: Which QB?
Matt Hasselbeck (Seneca Wallace) at Broncos 4 33.33%
Chad Pennington at Packers 8 66.67%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:00 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
I still think its an easy 3 bet but you all know the game conditions better than me etc. etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

Folding to a cap?

The more I think about the more I think I could be conviced a 3bet cant be that bad assuming he has a mid PP because no one at 5-T is folding to a 3 bet on the river
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:09 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
OK OK I hereby publicly apologize to Mr. Joe Tall for saying everyone would call this is a horrible fold and its closer to a 3 bet than a fold for sure. Clearly I was mistaken.

I still think its an easy 3 bet but you all know the game conditions better than me etc. etc.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

Against a regular in a party midstakes I am insta 3-betting fwiw.

Its only because his stats kinda indicate he is capable of playing TPTK passive that I hate raising here
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:11 PM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DeucesCracked - Serious Game
Posts: 6,426
Default Re: MORE POLLS

Yes but I doubt he would cap even AT given stats. The crux of my argument was I can't see this guy not sticking in a raise on flop or turn given two flush draws on the turn and top pair with no face cards out. Plus Joe is a statistical LAG if the guy has any stats.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:11 PM
FlopYouDead FlopYouDead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe my games are different but I see JJ never.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then why are you so afraid of a ten? JJ and Tx play the same on the flop and turn, except that Tx has 3 more outs if behind.

Why would anyone bluff this river? He cant be expectin gyou to fold. I'd call and expect a PP

[/ QUOTE ]

Tx is not capping pf but JJ will, tho not neccessarily always. JJ may wait for ace-less flop and then come to life. I see your point tho; they both beat same hands except Tx doesn't beat JJ.

As for a bluff, it's a retarded bluff, but the turn put 2 fd and the river is a semi-scare, so for a spaz it's gotta be tempting.

I still don't understand a 3-bet. Guy has to call to have any value. What hand is calling?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:15 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
What hand is calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

The same ones that riase the river for value and not a bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
As for a bluff, it's a retarded bluff, but the turn put 2 fd and the river is a semi-scare, so for a spaz it's gotta be tempting.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would expect a raise on the turn not the river with a fd.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:16 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
I still don't understand a 3-bet. Guy has to call to have any value. What hand is calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

Again. I am not 3-betting in this spot. But when I am, I am expecting to get called by lower pp's, other 1 pair hands and even AK - maybe even AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:21 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: MORE POLLS

I think this : [ QUOTE ]
Plus Joe is a statistical LAG if the guy has any stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

reveals a lot into this [ QUOTE ]
I still don't understand a 3-bet. Guy has to call to have any value. What hand is calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

UTG should know the river didnt help us, he may also know that we know that the river shouldnt have helped him.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:43 PM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 715
Default Re: MORE POLLS

Looks like I'm one of the few who voted raise if the call button is broken. I voted call in the original poll because this could be a bluff or a smaller PP. That's still true, and if our call button is broken, I still don't want to fold. So I have to 3-bet.

What if he caps? Since our call button is broken, does this mean we have to fold even if he turns 72o face up? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:50 PM
Joe Tall Joe Tall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Deucescracked - Serious Game
Posts: 10,220
Default Re: MORE POLLS

[ QUOTE ]
OK OK I hereby publicly apologize to Mr. Joe Tall for saying everyone would call this is a horrible fold and its closer to a 3 bet than a fold for sure. Clearly I was mistaken.

I still think its an easy 3 bet but you all know the game conditions better than me etc. etc.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

I should have taken that prop bet. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:53 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: MORE POLLS

"I still think its an easy 3 bet but you all know the game conditions better than me etc. etc."

"Against a regular in a party midstakes I am insta 3-betting fwiw."






also kross it depends on how often you're good, not just whether you should call given the initial pot size... math:

assume he never caps Tx so you never have to fold/lose another bet and that he always calls the 3-bet with any worse hand he has. clearly these are all optimistic for 3-betting.

x(11.5)-(1-x)(2)=0 <----- SOMEONE CHECK OK

x=~15%

so if you're ahead more than 15% you should rather raise than fold given the pot is this size, given these irrational assumptions. anyway, it is close. i'd think we're good less than 20% so i'd rather fold than 3-bet because i don't believe my two assumptions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.