#1
|
|||
|
|||
100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
I was not a huge fan of this hand. Help on all streets please.
I just sat down at the table with Villain, but he already seems to be aggressively playing almost every hand. 6-handed; Everyone is sitting with ~one stack ($100) Hero is BB, Villain is CO Preflop: Hero is dealt [6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ] 2 fold, CO raises to $3, Button calls, SB folds, Hero calls <font color="blue">I figured I could catch this guy bluffing if I hit big, and it was only a 3x raise with another caller, so I went for it. Let me know if this is spew.</font> Flop ($9.50): [5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ] Hero checks, Villain bets $7, Button folds, Hero raises to $21, Villain calls. <font color="blue">I went for a checkraise here with my nice open-ended draw, because I figured there was little chance that flop hit the villain and I expected him to c-bet 100% anyway. What I did not expect was for the villain to call, but I had outs.</font> Turn ($51.50): [9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]] <font color="blue">I just made my straight. Ship it!</font> Hero bets $35, Villain pushes for ~$80, Hero [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] <font color="blue">I'm crushing anything except 2 diamonds, and a villain this LAGgy could have air, one diamond, or an overpair/set here a lot of the time, so it's a clear call, right? Still, I can't help but feel like I went wrong somewhere(s) in this hand.</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
Well, obviously you have to call the turn. I think the hand in general is played fine.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
with those odds I think this is a snap-call, variance.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
yea get it in here, sucks to be OOP, i generally like to be in position playing these type of hands, against a good player I think you are representing a set maybe but against this guy i guess you have to get it in
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
pretty standard to me
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
I appreciate the analysis. Villain had 2 diamonds of course, but I don't think anyone in my position could put him specifically on J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ... yeah, looks like my read was right. Villain stayed at the table for a while, but ended up leaving with 4 stacks and I only managed to almost break even after taking several beats.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL: Playing suited near-connectors OOP
[ QUOTE ]
I appreciate the analysis. Villain had 2 diamonds of course, but I don't think anyone in my position could put him specifically on J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ... yeah, looks like my read was right. Villain stayed at the table for a while, but ended up leaving with 4 stacks and I only managed to almost break even after taking several beats. [/ QUOTE ] well if villain was playing aggresively and NOT over playing when he is beat, I would definitely go for a second check raise on the turn. Y against agro thinking villain who smack around button and co much will almost bet here when u dont double barrel. If you bet he isnt calling if he has nothing. VERY LITTLE implied odds against smart agro players. |
|
|