My opinion was different than others, but same as the floors....???

[RR]

[ QUOTE ]
wtf? Joe raises but it's not the minimum, call the floor? Alice acts out of turn, call the floor? Fred says pair of aces and turns over nut flush, call the floor? Minnesota Jim is so hammered, he forgot to post his blind, call the floor????


[/ QUOTE ]

These are not rulings. Anything where there is potential for disagreement the dealer does not have an opinion or anything to say about it. The dealer has to stay there for the rest of the down. In some jurisdictions it is illega for the dealer to make a decision.

[PantsOnFire]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wtf? Joe raises but it's not the minimum, call the floor? Alice acts out of turn, call the floor? Fred says pair of aces and turns over nut flush, call the floor? Minnesota Jim is so hammered, he forgot to post his blind, call the floor????


[/ QUOTE ]

These are not rulings. Anything where there is potential for disagreement the dealer does not have an opinion or anything to say about it. The dealer has to stay there for the rest of the down. In some jurisdictions it is illega for the dealer to make a decision.

[/ QUOTE ]
Okay, fair enough.

But in OP, I would think that the dealer could have at least made an initial ruling as to whether Player 3 made a call or was just counting out chips and still deciding.

The OP didn't make it clear what role dealer played in this and I'm just saying dealer should have at least made some sort of statement before floor is called.

[jeffnc]

Technically, her chips were too far in front when she dragged the last pot, right? I mean, if you're going to get technical about it, you would have to wait to deal the next hand until someone has completely cleared and stacked the previous pot, right? Or did I misunderstand, and she dragged the pot close to her, inside her cards?