|
View Poll Results: what is my destiny? | |||
heel | 0 | 0% | |
face | 0 | 0% | |
BASTARD! | 2 | 40.00% | |
ship it holla trollas | 3 | 60.00% | |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1001
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
im pretty horny but dont feel like putting in effort to getting laid. i know of one sure thing...shes not particularly good looking. should i wait it out or just go with the very meh-choice? [/ QUOTE ] |
#1002
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm engaged! Spent my entire BR on the ring!!! jk I proposed to my gf of 4 years this weekend. Might not be another 2 years before we get married though, I'll probably be starting grad school in the fall & she will be finishing it, but possibly starting law school. Life = over? [/ QUOTE ] I thought you were ghey? not trying to be condescending [/ QUOTE ] lol, why did you think that? |
#1003
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] almost right, it would be .08 x $60, not 55 edit- also it is very important whether rakeback, bonuses etc count towards the total. [/ QUOTE ] Apparently they don't which makes the bet ridiculous. I'd be utterly shocked if he has a 8% ROI 25 tabling the 60's. [/ QUOTE ] Wait why would they it be 4.4 times 60 when they taking the 5 out of the prize pool from everyone. The bet is not including rakeback. That's how rake works right. I always thought it worked like this. Lets say I played 1 game of the 22+ 2 which is = 24's s at ftp and I have a 10% roi. Isn't it 22 times 0.10 = 2.2 and then you calculate the rakeback so it's 2 times 0.27 = 54 cent. I'm probably a dumb ass [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#1004
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] almost right, it would be .08 x $60, not 55 edit- also it is very important whether rakeback, bonuses etc count towards the total. [/ QUOTE ] Apparently they don't which makes the bet ridiculous. I'd be utterly shocked if he has a 8% ROI 25 tabling the 60's. [/ QUOTE ] Wait why would they it be 4.4 times 60 when they taking the 5 out of the prize pool from everyone. The bet is not including rakeback. That's how rake works right. I always thought it worked like this. Lets say I played 1 game of the 22+ 2 which is = 24's s at ftp and I have a 10% roi. Isn't it 22 times 0.10 = 2.2 and then you calculate the rakeback so it's 2 times 0.27 = 54 cent. I'm probably a dumb ass [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] its return on total investment. this includes rake. so a 10% roi at the 22+2s is $2.40. rakeback is done right by you,but it looks like you have a higher roi than you think. |
#1005
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] almost right, it would be .08 x $60, not 55 edit- also it is very important whether rakeback, bonuses etc count towards the total. [/ QUOTE ] Apparently they don't which makes the bet ridiculous. I'd be utterly shocked if he has a 8% ROI 25 tabling the 60's. [/ QUOTE ] Wait why would they it be 4.4 times 60 when they taking the 5 out of the prize pool from everyone. The bet is not including rakeback. That's how rake works right. I always thought it worked like this. Lets say I played 1 game of the 22+ 2 which is = 24's s at ftp and I have a 10% roi. Isn't it 22 times 0.10 = 2.2 and then you calculate the rakeback so it's 2 times 0.27 = 54 cent. I'm probably a dumb ass [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] its return on total investment. this includes rake. so a 10% roi at the 22+2s is $2.40. rakeback is done right by you,but it looks like you have a higher roi than you think. [/ QUOTE ] So you get 2.40 per game and 54cent per game? |
#1006
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm a huge believer in the polyurethane now. Sucks they're like $1 each but whatever. [/ QUOTE ] Aren't you married? wtf? [/ QUOTE ] I'm just passing on some advice I wish I'd had when I was your age. [censored] abstinence only sex education. [censored] biggest waste of time ever. |
#1007
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
If you are calculating return on investment, it's return on what you spent, so $60, not $55. you can calculate it with or without rakeback. mostly we figure it without, and add in the rakeback as extra.
so, saying 10% roi and 27% rakeback would be the same as saying 12.25% roi including rakeback. |
#1008
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
Spacegravy would have a better shot 4-tabling the $225s with massive game selection, and just pray he runs super hot.
|
#1009
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone taking any prop bet action against Spacegravy on his challenge? $25K in 30 days playing $60 STT's... yeah OK [/ QUOTE ] When did this happen? It's really going to suck when people start noticing his ATC-ish SB open-shoves. Their spite-calls are going to be close to correct and it's WAY -$EV over the course of the game to shove too wide when the player to your left knows your too-wide range and calls correctly. |
#1010
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, OCTOBER, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone taking any prop bet action against Spacegravy on his challenge? $25K in 30 days playing $60 STT's... yeah OK [/ QUOTE ] When did this happen? It's really going to suck when people start noticing his ATC-ish SB open-shoves. Their spite-calls are going to be close to correct and it's WAY -$EV over the course of the game to shove too wide when the player to your left knows your too-wide range and calls correctly. [/ QUOTE ] I do not believe that spacegravy will successfully complete this challenge. However, most of his SNG experience is at the $16 level where several of your opponents to the left will be spite calling without even knowing it. Therefore he should be able to adapt his pushing ranges accordingly. |
|
|