#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just got pokertracker (stat post)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
you're not winning enough chips with AA. Could very well be variance in 200 sngs, but you may also be slowplaying too much. Don't slowplay, 130k of my 500k chip winnings in about 700 sngs has come from playing AA fast. You may also be overplaying AQ, but again this sample size is tiny. Don't go back to the $5's, and thats about it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
Your PFR at 200/400 and 300/600 seems low. Could be a small sample size though.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
what site is this at?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
Must be Stars with average players 9.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
[ QUOTE ]
you're not winning enough chips with AA. Could very well be variance in 200 sngs, but you may also be slowplaying too much. Don't slowplay, 130k of my 500k chip winnings in about 700 sngs has come from playing AA fast. You may also be overplaying AQ, but again this sample size is tiny. Don't go back to the $5's, and thats about it. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for the reponses, all. I wasn't sure if I'd get any because of the sample size. I think I've been plenty aggressive w/AA and AQo, but I'm paranoid enough that I'll take a look at them. Probably just variance. Lack of aggression at 200/400 and 300/600 is a leak I'm in the process of plugging. Basically, at the $11s those levels occur when I'm HU, and I haven't been aggressive enough there. FWIW, I play on Stars. So I shouldn't be worrying about my loss at the 100/200 level yet? And my VP$IP and PFR don't look too far off? Thanks again. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just got pokertracker (stat post)
I play on stars and 100/200 is my only losing level also. That's because if you haven't won a hand yet you're at about 1200 chips with blinds of 200 and it's time to do or die.
|
|
|