Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:43 PM
Akimka Akimka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Russia
Posts: 647
Default NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

Limper is 71/14/3.1. his CBF 58% so he folding plenty of hands while limp-calling raises most of the time.

Raiser is 22.5/14/5 (only 80 hands so far).

So what is Hero's hand range here to reraise and why?

Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $200
UTG+1: $195
CO: $257.35
Button: $492.40
Hero: $204.10
BB: $293.95

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with range in question
2 folds, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $10</font>, Hero raises to $35
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:48 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

it's fine. i like it with suited conntectors. big pairs and big off suit hands. and the occasional ATC but only when i KNOW the button is raiseing xtra light.

i'd rather call with middle pocket pairs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:51 PM
Akimka Akimka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Russia
Posts: 647
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

Same participiants.
Obv. right?
Range here is wider because of position. Right?
What is worst hand that I can do this here?
66+,ATo+,A8s+?

Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $212.10
UTG+1: $52.95
CO: $488.40
Hero: $194.10
SB: $201
BB: $418.65

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $10</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $35</font>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:54 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

I don't get your second uestion?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:57 PM
Veron Veron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Holland
Posts: 590
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

I'm doing this often. It's kind of the new squeeze play.
Ranges are very dependant on CO's isolating's range and his calling range after you 3bet.

I don't like it with ATo kind of hands, because you're oftenly in trouble if villain calls and an A flops.
I like it with suited connectors, pairs and ofcourse premiums.

But It's all about the raisers range and not uverusing this concept...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:57 PM
Akimka Akimka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Russia
Posts: 647
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't get your second uestion?

[/ QUOTE ]

I mean the same situation but when Hero is on position to the raise change anything? Or you haven't got something other? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:59 PM
Akimka Akimka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Russia
Posts: 647
Default Re: NL200: Possible utilization of reisolation play.

Suited connectors was off my reraising range. ty for pointing this out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.