#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL50 AA - Pot Control or Kind of Weak?
Villain is 19/4/2.0/72
Poker Stars, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter SB: $75.65 BB: $75.40 UTG: $61.55 Hero (MP): $94.70 CO: $60.85 BTN: $44.75 Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP) UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $2</font>, 2 folds, SB calls $1.75, BB calls $1.50 Flop: ($6) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 Players) SB checks, BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $4.50</font>, SB folds, BB calls $4.50 Turn: ($15) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero checks River: ($15) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) BB checks, Hero checks Villain had folded to more c-bets than he had called. I checked the Turn for pot control and planned on re-evaluating the River, altho I do realize there are many draws out there. I then figured no worse hand would call a River bet so I checked behind. Reasonable thinking or weak? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 AA - Pot Control or Kind of Weak?
bet the turn, as there are still a number of draws/qx hands he can have that he will continue w/.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 AA - Pot Control or Kind of Weak?
bet turn for value. So many worse hands will call.
checking behind river is fine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 AA - Pot Control or Kind of Weak?
After you check the turn I don't really see how you can bet the river. I'd check behind too.
As others have said, bet the turn. Even though villain is tight this is a draw heavy board. Bet turn/check river is better than check turn/bet river. If he has a draw you won't get value on the river if he misses. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 AA - Pot Control or Kind of Weak?
yes bet the turn. Too many draws, plus if SB calls your flop be they are most likely going to call the turn bet, so you are losing value.
check river. |
|
|