|
|
#3
10-23-2006, 05:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL books
I have never heard of a book by Esfanderi, and I have been lruking these forums for a while, am I stupid?
|
|
#4
10-23-2006, 07:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL books
It's the book I mention in this thread.
|
|
#5
10-23-2006, 08:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL books
There really isn't much around, you'll just have to do with NL - theory and practice
And there are different opinions are to whether it is good or not, some praise it and some don't.
|
|
#6
10-23-2006, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL books
[ QUOTE ]
There really isn't much around, you'll just have to do with NL - theory and practice And there are different opinions are to whether it is good or not, some praise it and some don't. [/ QUOTE ] That's a bit misleading. The response here has been overwhelmingly positive and the reviewers on Amazon have given it 4/5 stars. Yes there are some who don't give it high marks, but they are in the clear minority. What are your thoughts on the book? I think it's excellent for its intended purpose (deep stack no limit).
|
|
#7
10-23-2006, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL books
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] There really isn't much around, you'll just have to do with NL - theory and practice And there are different opinions are to whether it is good or not, some praise it and some don't. [/ QUOTE ] That's a bit misleading. The response here has been overwhelmingly positive and the reviewers on Amazon have given it 4/5 stars. Yes there are some who don't give it high marks, but they are in the clear minority. What are your thoughts on the book? I think it's excellent for its intended purpose (deep stack no limit). [/ QUOTE ] i was under the impression that it was being given less than top marks only because it is "too advanced" for some and the math content might put some people off. personally i loved the book, although i wanted it to last longer (not that it is short).
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
