Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > About the Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: NLCS
Cards in 4 0 0%
Cards in 5 1 6.25%
Cards in 6 3 18.75%
Cards in 7 3 18.75%
Mets in 4 0 0%
Mets in 5 6 37.50%
Mets in 6 2 12.50%
Mets in 7 1 6.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #631  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:39 AM
stabn stabn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: eatin ur taco
Posts: 9,680
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

Whoever locked ***ADMINISTRATOSR**** before i got a chance to reply has earned my undying hatred.
  #632  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:48 AM
*TT* *TT* is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vehicle Chooser For Life!
Posts: 17,198
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NT!

[/ QUOTE ]
"In any suitably large online forum, there are retards like edfurlong and tuk who will reply to every post"

LOL. Proud to have made the sticky! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

So proud of you and Ed! Perhaps NT! will provide a trophy?
  #633  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:56 AM
RoundGuy RoundGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Buying more VO, ldo
Posts: 1,932
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Whoever locked ***ADMINISTRATOSR**** before i got a chance to reply has earned my undying hatred.

[/ QUOTE ]
AGREED!! Unless it was MH. I just love that silly Brit.
  #634  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:57 AM
NT! NT! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 17,165
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Whoever locked ***ADMINISTRATOSR**** before i got a chance to reply has earned my undying hatred.

[/ QUOTE ]
AGREED!! Unless it was MH. I just love that silly Brit.

[/ QUOTE ]

isn't he irish? ban plz
  #635  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:15 PM
seemorenuts seemorenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 317
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I have little or no knowledge about who NT is, BTW, is he the only mod for OOT?

All I know is that I read the rules for OOT, I posted for a day or two, and I got banned, and for that... well, I'm not going to do business much with 2+2 in the future.

Whoever banned me was a complete imbecile.

Yes, I have an IQ over 200 (but I say 170 so as not to antagonize those between the numbers) and I have so much to contribute (I proposed a method to inject trillions into the poker economy through improved tipping algorithms, demonstrated how to Rate Sklansky's edge, and last week I found the solution to world peace, and you know what? I'm NOT EVEN KIDDING!).

So to hell with 2+2

[/ QUOTE ]

all i have in my notes about you is that you got a * for posting some creationist spam in OOT. you got banned by another mod in another forum for (shock) spamming about WPEX. oh, and since that happened like 2 months ago you have made the majority of your posts on this account. so way to show your firm resolve with a boycott!

so try using that 200+ IQ of yours to figure out which forum you got banned in before you go back to pocketfives with your tail between your legs.


don't respond, you're only giving 2p2 more business!

[/ QUOTE ]

First off, thank you for the courtesy of telling me what your notes say.

Secondly, do you seriously think I don't know where I posted, or if I do, that I care one whit what I typed previously? I know you can look at my valuable posts by searching that's all that's necessary, 2+2 isn't that important, look ... a speling error, see? No need to prove anything here.

So do you really think that your mod who has an IQ of 100-101 (on average) can make a better decision than I could about posting in OOT about a dinosaur motif on a 14th century ornament? The entire text in the contents of that link had nothing to do with proselytizing creationism, and the links, though they may have, should not be considered when making this judgment, as 2+2 posters should be given the benefit of the doubt here. I know that OOT was the correct forum for that simple question, how do dinosaur motifs, accurate ones, in several locales, in reliable circumstances, appear prior to sufficient paleontological (sic) evidence can deduce their probable morphology?

I do not care about whether evolutionary theory or creationist theory are true or false. I just want to know how you explain simple matters and why people refuse to take real evidence and incorporate it into their theories.

That other forgettable forum that I posted in, I was not spamming about WSEX, because I was responding to a specific post that accused me of something re the topic of WSEX, so any response has to include mention of it.

If your mod there had an IQ of 101 he would have left me alone on that basis.

You have a lot of nerve telling me what to do with my 200+ IQ--on what authority do you do this, besides being a mod?

You don't tell poker champions what to do, so don't tell me what to do unless you want to look stupid.

So answer the damn dinosaur question, and don't accuse me of being a freakin' creationist. OR is this too much of a challenge to you imbeciles at 2+2?
  #636  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:19 PM
seemorenuts seemorenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 317
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

To give you a rough idea as to what it's like for me to communicate with you, imagine yourself talking to a rock.

IQ200/IQ100~ IQ100/IQ50

close enough, so show some freakin' respect, imbeciles (relatively speaking)
  #637  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:21 PM
seemorenuts seemorenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 317
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

Have a look at the thread where I mentioned WSEX.

That's the one where I show how to save trillions over 30 years for the poker playing public.

Yes, I showed a lack of respect: the cause?

Those three stars of David you assigned me caused the imbeciles who post to attac those ad hominem instead of the content of my post, so I didn't care any more.

Hey, come to mention it, where the hell are my three stars?
  #638  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:23 PM
seemorenuts seemorenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 317
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

Okay, if you removed those three stars, that shows very good judgment. I will now proceed to use my genius in an orderly manner, and treat you children gently...

thank you.
  #639  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:23 PM
kkcountry kkcountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: selling my location, pm 4 detailz
Posts: 3,599
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Have a look at the thread where I mentioned WSEX.

That's the one where I show how to save trillions over 30 years for the poker playing public.

Yes, I showed a lack of respect: the cause?

Those three stars of David you assigned me caused the imbeciles who post to attac those ad hominem instead of the content of my post, so I didn't care any more.

Hey, come to mention it, where the hell are my three stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL you have an IQ of 200 and don't know what an asterisk is?
  #640  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:25 PM
stabn stabn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: eatin ur taco
Posts: 9,680
Default Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread

[ QUOTE ]

Have a look at the thread where I mentioned WSEX.

That's the one where I show how to save trillions over 30 years for the poker playing public.


[/ QUOTE ]


luls.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.