Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2007, 11:05 PM
recallme recallme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,759
Default TPTK

Game #4681396024: Hold'em NL ($2/$5) - 2007/06/13 - 22:30:37 (DST)
Table "Heartsdefender" Seat 2 is the button.
Seat 1: loibedo ($500 in chips)
Seat 2: nameless ($337.82 in chips)
Seat 3: mrlose ($1099.15 in chips)
Seat 4: Dentist1 ($193 in chips)
Seat 5: Lattice ($496.30 in chips)
Seat 6: MikkeMus ($494 in chips)
mrlose: posts small blind $2
Dentist1: posts big blind $5
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to mrlose [Qh As]
Lattice: folds
MikkeMus: folds
nameless: raises to $15
mrlose: raises to $50
Dentist1: folds
nameless: calls $35
----- FLOP ----- [Qs 9s Jc]
mrlose: bets $85
nameless: raises to $175

Villain is 42/24/1.7
Am i pushing or folding?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2007, 11:21 PM
wpr101 wpr101 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,821
Default Re: TPTK

I'm not really sure. Seems like a close decision.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-13-2007, 11:24 PM
KingGordy KingGordy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,392
Default Re: TPTK

Given the stack sizes here betting the flop without the intention of felting it seems pretty bad. It's kind of sick that villain chose to minraise instead of push given he has so little behind, but I think you have to felt it anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:15 AM
BDaws BDaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,532
Default Re: TPTK

[ QUOTE ]
Given the stack sizes here betting the flop without the intention of felting it seems pretty bad.

[/ QUOTE ]
Betting/folding this flop would be fine against some villains and with different stack sizes, right? Especially considering we have the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] making it less likely he is semibluffing a draw?

And, we should be continuation betting in this spot pretty close to 100% of the time, right?

Sorry if these are easy questions, I have been playing 3 bet pots poorly as of late.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2007, 02:47 AM
yoshi86 yoshi86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: fish market
Posts: 447
Default Re: TPTK

[ QUOTE ]

Betting/folding this flop would be fine against some villains and with different stack sizes, right? Especially considering we have the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] making it less likely he is semibluffing a draw?

And, we should be continuation betting in this spot pretty close to 100% of the time, right?

Sorry if these are easy questions, I have been playing 3 bet pots poorly as of late.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes but this guy has like 2/3 a BI. Call this [censored].

You should throw out a CB >70% of the time. It depends on the board.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:22 AM
paradroid12 paradroid12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 25
Default Re: TPTK

Push and pray for 2s 3s. I stoved a big (and probably overly-generous) range for villain. Looks only slightly more like a combo draw than a monster to me (but what do I know). Be glad he has not much behind and felt it, I think.

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

133,650 games 0.010 secs 13,365,000 games/sec

Board: Qs 9s Jc
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 51.204% 48.51% 02.70% 64830 3604.50 { AsQh }
Hand 1: 48.796% 46.10% 02.70% 61611 3604.50 { 99+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, T9s, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo, T9o }
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2007, 04:15 AM
BDaws BDaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,532
Default Re: TPTK

paradroid12,
He only needs to call 202.82 more in a 477.82 pot, or .2980 equity to break even.

Against a narrow range of JJ+, 99, AQ and KQ we are roughly breakeven. This is a fairly narrow range, but the postflop minraise on this kind of board when he can easily push himself makes me believe he does have a fairly narrow range.

That said, he is a shortstack and could be doing something retarded or semibluffing in a weird way so I call.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2007, 04:43 AM
thatpfunk thatpfunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sandy eggo
Posts: 5,784
Default Re: TPTK

if you bet the flop you have to get it ai imo.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2007, 05:17 AM
cheet cheet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 231
Default Re: TPTK

[ QUOTE ]
paradroid12,
He only needs to call 202.82 more in a 477.82 pot, or .2980 equity to break even.

Against a narrow range of JJ+, 99, AQ and KQ we are roughly breakeven. This is a fairly narrow range, but the postflop minraise on this kind of board when he can easily push himself makes me believe he does have a fairly narrow range.

That said, he is a shortstack and could be doing something retarded or semibluffing in a weird way so I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, this is a +EV call
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.