Intimacy: oral vs. regular sex

[ConstantineX]

It's all about face to face LDO

[Kneel B4 Zod]

need to add anal, both giving and receiving obv

[admiralfluff]

We have 2 rabbits: one girl, one guy, both nuetered. Robert always tries to take Petunia from behind, but Petunia only allows oral sex. Robert eventually gives up trying to get behind her, and begrudgingly humps her face. Petunia clearly thinks intercourse is more intimate than oral sex.

My gf thinks oral sex (fellatio) is more intimate than regular styles, but she does not do either with Robert or Petunia, so this is irrelevalt. imo.

[AcTiOnJaCsOn]

nothin wrong with either

[Alobar]

regular sex is waaaay more intimate for a number of reasons. The foremost being there is penetration, which while maybe just being symbolic is a pretty profound thing when its shared between two people who have an emotional bond.

There is eye contact, looking into someones eyes while you are sharing a connection is much more intimate than holding the back of someones head while they slobber all over your nether region.

You are both actively participating in the gratification of the other person. Its not just you pleasing her, or her pleasing you, you are pleasing each other. Thats much more intimate than one person doing all the work and not getting pleasure themselves (or at leas the same degree of pleasure).


I think people who consider oral sex more intimate (I know a lot of girls who will let you [censored] them, but wont let you go down on them because "that's too personal") are mostly just having sex for the [censored] aspect of it. You can make sex pretty impersonal, and not all that intimate. But if intimacy is actually the goal, I cant even fathom how someone could consider oral a more intimate experience than regular sex.

[MaxxDaddy]

[ QUOTE ]
regular sex is waaaay more intimate for a number of reasons. The foremost being there is penetration, which while maybe just being symbolic is a pretty profound thing when its shared between two people who have an emotional bond.

There is eye contact, looking into someones eyes while you are sharing a connection is much more intimate than holding the back of someones head while they slobber all over your nether region.

You are both actively participating in the gratification of the other person. Its not just you pleasing her, or her pleasing you, you are pleasing each other. Thats much more intimate than one person doing all the work and not getting pleasure themselves (or at leas the same degree of pleasure).


I think people who consider oral sex more intimate (I know a lot of girls who will let you [censored] them, but wont let you go down on them because "that's too personal") are mostly just having sex for the [censored] aspect of it. You can make sex pretty impersonal, and not all that intimate. But if intimacy is actually the goal, I cant even fathom how someone could consider oral a more intimate experience than regular sex.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well put, despite your avatar.

[MuresanForMVP]

what is that av from anyways?

[FlyWf]

[ QUOTE ]


There is eye contact,



[/ QUOTE ]



The link is NSFW so don't click if you're a wage slave.

[traz]

When girls say they find oral more intimate, they don't necessarily mean "intimate"...most just mean oral is too embarrassing unless they are really comfortable. It's not really the same thing.

I think there's something deep in our core that says intercourse is more intimate. Something natural and instinctive. You're probably missing a chromosome or 2 if you think otherwise :P

[CrazyEyez]

Girls think oral is foreplay (ie precursor to the "real" thing) and/or they think you would let any chick blow you but would be more selective about who you do regular with. Therefore regular is the more intimate to them.

That might be a [censored] explanation but the point I'm attempting to make is: remember that intimacy for a woman has much less to do with physicality than for a guy. Not that the answer has to be different for a guy, just that your op seems to be coming at it from a strictly anatomical perspective.

p.s. alobar is right as usual and has rendered my post lame due to his being better at the english and the thinking.