Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Affiliates/RakeBack

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2007, 02:41 PM
deflY deflY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 314
Default NoiQ vs Noble

Hi guys,

I just want to ask you whether someone knows which site has the better rakeback % - Noble w/ 41% or NoiQ w/ the VIP program and bonus payment.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2007, 02:49 PM
Ballerpoker Ballerpoker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

Noiq has up to 40% with the highest VIP level. And their races has good value for highstakes players. It generally depends on the stakes you play. Imo for lowstakes I would go for Noble but for higher stakes I would go for Noiq although it should be possible to get better deals than the VIP cashback.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2007, 03:28 PM
SilverRakeBack SilverRakeBack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 71
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble *DELETED*

Post deleted by Pokeraddict
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2007, 03:34 PM
CountingMyOuts CountingMyOuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 250
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

^^ Interesting info, but mileage will vary by type of game played (shorthanded versus full ring).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2007, 07:01 PM
GamblerZone GamblerZone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 87
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble *DELETED*

Post deleted by Pokeraddict
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2007, 07:06 PM
Bobo Fett Bobo Fett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada, Eh!
Posts: 3,283
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

[ QUOTE ]
The reason is that since these sites all use the same system, where FPP is a central part, it depends very much on whether the player is loose or tight +++.

(This is just to clarify that NoIQ and Chili f.ex is not varying 20% in RB)

Best Regards

[/ QUOTE ]
I can't speak to NoIQ and Chili specifically, but it is my understanding that some iPoker sites award points differently than others.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2007, 08:54 PM
GamblerZone GamblerZone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 87
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

Hi Bobo,

They may try to interpret that, but from our understanding this FPP system is ran by iPoker directly, meaning no matter what the poker sites setup, iPoker has the last word.

Although, I guess, there's no guarantee anything we know is correct.

But we see your point :>
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2007, 07:47 AM
Mr. Wishbone Mr. Wishbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lurking @ HSNL
Posts: 236
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

Ryu was talking about tournament fees, then you can calculate the exact rb-%, because you get the same amount of points for every dollar of fees at the level you are at. Cash game rb-% is different and has to with how tight/loose you are.

Quick example: NOIQ = 40 points at level 6, Chili 30 points at ultimate level.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2007, 07:50 AM
SilverRakeBack SilverRakeBack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 71
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

true.. I also stated it was on tournament fees/rake, and don't forget also the deposit bonus is different on both sites, which has not been accounted for

Ryu
SRB
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2007, 03:51 PM
freecard4all freecard4all is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 479
Default Re: NoiQ vs Noble

[ QUOTE ]
Cash game rb-% is different and has to with how tight/loose you are.

[/ QUOTE ]
the points are dealt method. How can it be dependent of tightness/looseness?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.