Official Stars Regulars Thread - Page 38

ipokeder · #**371** 08-17-2007, 03:11 PM

i think 20 buck spin and elky are pretty good but i don't play with them much so w/e

you probably are giving them way too little credit though

TheWorstPlayer · #**372** 08-17-2007, 03:23 PM

no one defends our very own catcher????? you guys are all dicks...

Ship Ship McGipp · #**373** 08-17-2007, 03:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i think 20 buck spin and elky are pretty good but i don't play with them much so w/e

[/ QUOTE ]

ahh, all makes sense now

creative · #**374** 08-17-2007, 04:28 PM

thoughts on meee

TheWorstPlayer · #**375** 08-17-2007, 04:37 PM

u suck ldo

trplthrt · #**376** 08-17-2007, 04:45 PM

I'm not sure if I want to be on this radar or not.. but I guess I don't play enough to be on anyone's fish or shark list. Maybe that is +ev?

fslexcduck · #**377** 08-17-2007, 04:50 PM

i need to play more so i can get some love in these threads.

edit: or hate

TheWorstPlayer · #**378** 08-17-2007, 04:58 PM

I love you

edit: or hate you

Pillars · #**379** 08-17-2007, 05:28 PM

The fact that Kelsitaan plays a very unorthodox style while lacking many fundamental skills and is still [in my opinion] a big winner makes it even more interesting. His style is best against poor-average players and especially weak-tight players, though, and doesn't stand up well against other thinking, aggressive players. I was never claiming he was an amazing player, just that he was one of the biggest winners at full-ring [at least at 3/6.] I agree that he'd have to develop a lot as a player before he could sustain a decent winrate at 6-max.

ImsaKidd · #**380** 08-17-2007, 05:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i need to play more so i can get some love in these threads.

edit: or hate

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe if there was a datamine of largest pots won with 86s you would show up?