#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe it doesn't matter to you, but I think many people who read this thread want to know. [/ QUOTE ] It may matter to those who disregard the rules of the sport as written and choose instead to impose their own made-up based on their own preferences. But, I'm not one of those people, so I can't help you. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
This is not a complicated question. How likely is it that you think Bonds used PEDs or steroids?
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
The argument should center around the unknown, the possibilities, our own opinions. [/ QUOTE ] The argument should center around what we don't know, and our own subjective opinions? Sweet... And here I am trying to use things like facts and details instead of speculation and conjecture. [ QUOTE ] I think the fact that you have to constantly fall back on what is "known" is pretty damning in its own right. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, it's pretty damning that I use facts to justify my position, as opposed to wild ass speculation. Silly me. [ QUOTE ] The fact that you shy away from drawing your own opinions from all the conjecture, all the rumors, is damning. [/ QUOTE ] I haven't shied away from drawing my own opinion, it's just that I've based it upon indisputable fact. That you find it damning that I prefer to avoid rumor and conjecture is....well, I just don't know what to say. I mean, seriously. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I didn't ask you for a percentage of cheating. Please answer the question. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, I see....in previous threads, you asserted that PED use was synonymous with cheating.....and now you're saying that isn't the case. Make up your mind already....sheesh. From the other thread: [ QUOTE ] <font color="red">Posted by manbearpig</font> So if you admit that their is a possibility that Bonds used PED's then you are admitting their is a chance that Bonds cheated, which seems to go against your previous comments. Because: possible PED use= possible cheating [/ QUOTE ] Let me guess, you say you aren't asking about cheating....but then when someone assigns a percentage of PED use, you will say "HA! THEN HE WAS CHEATING! BECAUSE PED USE = CHEATING! HA HA!" C'mon man, seriously. [/ QUOTE ] LOL. Just answer it. Obviously you think PED use in 1998 was not cheating, I think it was kinda cheating in a spirit of the rules way but not in a punishable way, and some people think that it should result in beheading. That is irrelevant. The cheating part is a judgment call. Even if we knew someone was 100% using we could still argue over whether that is cheating or not. I just want your OPINION on the percentages. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
The real difference of course, being that you worship at the altar of one, and you prejudge the other. [/ QUOTE ] And also, LOL. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
This is not a complicated question. How likely is it that you think Bonds used PEDs or steroids? [/ QUOTE ] It's very unlikely that he used steroids in violation of the rules of baseball, given that no credible evidence exists to prove it. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The argument should center around the unknown, the possibilities, our own opinions. [/ QUOTE ] The argument should center around what we don't know, and our own subjective opinions? Sweet... And here I am trying to use things like facts and details instead of speculation and conjecture. [ QUOTE ] I think the fact that you have to constantly fall back on what is "known" is pretty damning in its own right. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, it's pretty damning that I use facts to justify my position, as opposed to wild ass speculation. Silly me. [ QUOTE ] The fact that you shy away from drawing your own opinions from all the conjecture, all the rumors, is damning. [/ QUOTE ] I haven't shied away from drawing my own opinion, it's just that I've based it upon indisputable fact. That you find it damning that I prefer to avoid rumor and conjecture is....well, I just don't know what to say. I mean, seriously. [/ QUOTE ] AFAIK you cant really argue about facts. They are indisputable. So yes, the argument should center around what we kinda sorta might maybe know. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is not a complicated question. How likely is it that you think Bonds used PEDs or steroids? [/ QUOTE ] It's very unlikely that he used steroids in violation of the rules of baseball, given that no credible evidence exists to prove it. [/ QUOTE ] Truly amazing. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
I think one detail you are missing is that the RP case is a subjective opinion of an intangible quality. The BB case is a yes/no proposition. [/ QUOTE ] Hey, *you* are the one that brought up the RP situation as being similar....I'm the one who has been saying they are different. Thanks for finally acknowledging that. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] You fell right into that one.... [ QUOTE ] <snip Ron Paul diatribe> [/ QUOTE ] Take it to politics, hoss. We can discuss your Grand Wizard there. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's very unlikely that he used steroids in violation of the rules of baseball, given that no credible evidence exists to prove it. [/ QUOTE ] Truly amazing. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I know....silly me using those facts and details again instead of engaging in your speculation and conjecture. |
|
|