#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] easy b/f $410 [/ QUOTE ] edit: I'd also make it more pf being that A) we're oop and B) we're 425bb deep [/ QUOTE ] I thought of doing this, but I figured that would be obvious to a decent player if all the sudden by 3 bet was $60+ instead of $50. To me, it seemed like it would basically tell him I have a huge hand and he has very large implied odds to call. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah making it bigger preflop works only up to a certain stack size. Once you get really deep by making it bigger preflop you are just making ur reverse implied odds bigger. Tbh i think the best play preflop is to flat call unless villain is a huge retard that doesnt understand hand ranges |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
or u could fake reraise to 500.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
b/f was the first thing to come to mind
i suppose c/c isn't bad if you expect him to bluff a missed flush draw. i just cannot imagine KQ or AQ betting this river if checked to |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
I'm really unsure what you're expecting from this post. Obviously most people are going to say b/f.
What stands out the most to me is that you're 4+ buyins deep yet you are unable to provide any info on the guy. This is probably because you're multra-tabling (with or without hud); but if you're posting hands in MSNL and are trying to get better, then I just don't get that. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c [/ QUOTE ] el |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river [/ QUOTE ] I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
without reads anything besides betting is pretty awful, imo. this is why you like playing [censored] players deep.
he is checking behind a lot hands. you get to value bet him to death. he doesn't bluff, ever, if you bet. he rarely bluffs if you check. he rarely bets for value with a hand you beat if you check. players at this level suck at playing deep, big pots so you should take advantage of this by extracting max value in these situations. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you should also consider 1/2 pot / call. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river [/ QUOTE ] I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise. [/ QUOTE ] never, ever, ever. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 425 bb deep with AA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c [/ QUOTE ] el [/ QUOTE ] oops sorry |
|
|