Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:08 PM
0evg0 0evg0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mano a mano
Posts: 9,235
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
and to everyone saying cr turn ai - that is certainly kind of standard and something i was considering when i saw the turn card, but his bet size made me rethink - even with the benefit of hindsight i think ck call is better - would be happy to listen to an argument otherwise, but i just feel like he's not bet folding the turn unless he has air - which means i should call pretty much any river (?) - again happy to hear counterarguments cause i can certainly be missing something.

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty close

i agree on the only thing he's bet/folding on turn is air, so there's really not that much reason to shove unless you think he suddenly potted turn with air that picked up a lot of equity on the turn (tho obv you'd still be miiiiles ahead)

i prob call river, but 70 hands is pretty tough to feel good about making a thin call like this so its def understandable to 2nd guess it.

i really feel like if youre beat here, it's by QJ.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:11 PM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somerville
Posts: 10,043
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
a turn cr allin seems pretty bad against this guy. the only benefits are if he's bet/folding A3/KQ (seems retarded and unlikely) or happens to have exactly 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]x[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]/straightflush draw and will call it off (and not bluff the river if he misses)

c/c turn + c/c all rivers gotta be better than turn cr allin

[/ QUOTE ]
i agree with donkey.. people like c/r just bc it avoids a tough decision (river payoff or not) but it doesnt really accomplish anything more then c/c c/c would.

although there is likely SOME thin FE on the turn (like if villain DOES b/f KQ)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:12 PM
EC10 EC10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: not folding
Posts: 2,471
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

id check shove turn. it makes the hand really easy to play and is NEVER a big mistake given our hand/equity if behind/metagame etc.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:13 PM
0evg0 0evg0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mano a mano
Posts: 9,235
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
id check shove turn. it makes the hand really easy to play and is NEVER a big mistake given our hand/equity if behind/metagame etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

obv this is correct, but would you agree it's lazy and costing you (even if it's minimal) money?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:16 PM
EC10 EC10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: not folding
Posts: 2,471
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

costing us money how? being OOP on any river will be a tough spot.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:18 PM
donkey donkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 738
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
id check shove turn. it makes the hand really easy to play and is NEVER a big mistake given our hand/equity if behind/metagame etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

that's a really bad reason to check/shove.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:21 PM
0evg0 0evg0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mano a mano
Posts: 9,235
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
costing us money how? being OOP on any river will be a tough spot.

[/ QUOTE ]

costing us money by making a less +EV play.

what does the fact that it will be difficult to play have to do with expected value?

i mean, if you wanna argue that it's not worth the headache in order to get an extra $20 of equity alright, but you can't say that just because c/shoving is never -EV or because it is easier it is the best option
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:29 PM
Parlay Slow Parlay Slow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Proud to be Polish!
Posts: 3,869
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

I like a c/r all-in on the turn
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:30 PM
Pasterbator Pasterbator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ruining lives.
Posts: 4,795
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
id check shove turn. it makes the hand really easy to play and is NEVER a big mistake given our hand/equity if behind/metagame etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

he never folds an A and he folds all bluffs...

The only reason id want to fold this is bc of his flop bet. IME, these tiny flop bets combined with the turn ~pot are "bi" hands.

I definitely call sometimes tho...

FWIW, i definitely see people showing up with AQ here, as bad as it is...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:31 PM
Pasterbator Pasterbator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ruining lives.
Posts: 4,795
Default Re: eh can i maybe call this?

[ QUOTE ]
I like a c/r all-in on the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

Plz elaborate.

the more i think about it, the more i understand why the turn push is a good option, but i wouldnt mind someone throwing some more words out there.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.