|
|
#11
09-12-2007, 09:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
I assume u are not really thinking 14/13 is as nitty as 12/10? [/ QUOTE ] Of course not...just saying 14/13 is still super nitty. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] And you're right, I didn't contribute anything so: [ QUOTE ] this is called slowplaying [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#12
09-12-2007, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
I think this is a good play to mix it up and it punishes light 3betters/isolators.
|
|
#13
09-12-2007, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
I like this move better in SS B&M situations where table texture is frequently LAGgy with a mix of limpers. I was in just this situation a few days ago where I had AA twice in the session. The second time I call UTG, one fold, one raise to 12, a call, fold, raise to 30, SB and BB fold, I shove yadda yadda yadda. Not a play I'd make very often, but after 2 hours with the same gaggle of players flat calling raises re-raises with 4 or 5 to the flop it seemed like OK timing. Online I rarely see that kind of play.
|
|
#14
09-13-2007, 06:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
im a 14/13 [/ QUOTE ] jjjjeeeesus chhhhhhhrist and only if im 75%+ sure the shortstack will stackoff, however its hard to say since thins situation never shows up, atleast not for me, it also depends on the players in between.
|
|
#15
09-13-2007, 06:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is a good play to mix it up and it punishes light 3betters/isolators. [/ QUOTE ] In my experience these kinds of players are few and far between at 100nl. So you'll end up in a lot of multiway pots and bad spots with your AA. oh, and [ QUOTE ] this is called slowplaying [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#16
09-13-2007, 06:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
Tbh I think you should not be using things like this at freakin 100nl, this is mid stakes thinking.
Just learn to valuebet and bluff at good spots and move up.
|
|
#17
09-13-2007, 10:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah i play on everest [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] my own stats over 40K hands say im a 14/13 so not that nitty but you ofcourse are right. [/ QUOTE ] lol, that's super nitty
|
|
#18
09-13-2007, 01:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
Tbh I think you should not be using things like this at freakin 100nl, this is mid stakes thinking. Just learn to valuebet and bluff at good spots and move up. [/ QUOTE ] Why not, it'll work anywhere if you think the shorty will push. I prefer this in a tournament tho.
|
|
#19
09-13-2007, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
this is called slowplaying [/ QUOTE ] This is more correctly called a back raise. Typically calling a pfr w/ AA or KK then pushing over the top of a rr along with whatever callers come along. The rr does not have to be a shortie.
|
|
#20
09-13-2007, 02:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A bit of a new theory i call \'fake isolation\'
[ QUOTE ]
This is more correctly called a back raise. Typically calling a pfr w/ AA or KK then pushing over the top of a rr along with whatever callers come along. The rr does not have to be a shortie. [/ QUOTE ] No, a back raise is when you cold-call a PF raise and shove/4-bet after someone squeezes. OP is talking about limping up front...AKA slow-playing.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
