Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > MOD DISCUSSION
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 10-04-2007, 08:08 PM
MrWookie MrWookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Treating my drinking problem
Posts: 17,411
Default Re: Nath....

[ QUOTE ]
wookie,

the quoted text from my post includes a clause for dealing with [censored] that is totally out of line or violates t&c.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but allow me to rephrase. I don't think mods should be obligated to come in here and justify themselves in a thread every time they ban someone who was trolling them and show explicitly how they were violating the T&C and not just saying something the mod in question disagreed with. Instead, I think the idea of checking with another mod should be added to the list of "good practices" or whatever rather than a hard and fast rule. Mods are encouraged to consult others in these cases, but if they don't, no biggie, esp. if it was determined to be a justified ban after the fact. If the mod seems to have a recurring problem differentiating spirited disagreement and T&C violations and isn't consulting other mods, then he or she gets a stern talking to from the reds.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-04-2007, 10:12 PM
Ryan Beal Ryan Beal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,461
Default Re: Nath....

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think mods should be obligated to come in here and justify themselves in a thread every time they ban someone who was trolling them

[/ QUOTE ]

That's part of the idea behind avoiding it to begin with. For a while the general guideline has been that mods should get a red involved if they want to ban someone mostly for personal attacks on them. I think it's also fine to let another mod of the same forum address it when applicable. Really this would only be putting what has already been said into the official sticky.

I'd probably just quote citanul.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 10-04-2007, 11:41 PM
NT! NT! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 17,165
Default Re: Nath....

[ QUOTE ]
The rudest word in the world, that I was told when I was 7 and I've never heard said by anyone since, begins with P.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, let's hear it
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:20 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Nath....

[ QUOTE ]
ryan,

please to be allowing durron to create a citanulisright gimmick account with access to the mod forum, which he will use only to post here. it has great potential.

c

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:21 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Nath....

p.s. citanul for admin
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:23 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Nath....

by the way, when alphawice was harrassing VR (details are unnecessary and won't be repeated by me anyway), she came to [censored] and i and we dealt with it. thats how his original account got banned to begin with. i definitely think that situation worked out much better than if VR had just banned him herself.

in other words, citanulisright
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:26 AM
Buzz Buzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,633
Default Re: Nath....

[ QUOTE ]
wow, let's hear it

[/ QUOTE ]

For the crossword fans, I'm guessing five letters with an alternate definition, as a noun, being "the small hole made by piercing something with a sharp point."

Buzz
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:30 AM
Ryan Beal Ryan Beal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,461
Default Re: Nath....

Yeah but surely he's heard that since he was seven?

I can't figure it out...
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:34 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: taking your lunch money
Posts: 11,179
Default Re: Nath....

ponce?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:36 AM
miajag miajag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bawlmer, hon
Posts: 8,266
Default Re: Nath....

pozzed?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.