#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
[ QUOTE ]
UTG+1 pushes after limping in and after you make a standard raise = fold. Just [censored] risking this with JJ so early; find a better spot (which shouldn't be too hard given at least one players fine preflop play). Barry [/ QUOTE ] Why do so many people in this forum not want to "risk it" so early in the tournament?? I don't even know what that means. Hero has the best hand and he is way ahead of villain's range. He's 82% against all the 55-TT crap villian is pushing. Even against AK, KQ, etc, he's 55%. And villian almost never has QQ+. It's a call. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
That's funny, when I am browsing in this board, I often wonder why people want to "risk it" so early in the tournament. I think it means that doubling up in the first hand means only little more than jackshit, while losing simply costs you the tournament. FWIW, if I know that one or two of the donks behind me love to raise multiple limpers, I autolimp my monsters.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
[ QUOTE ]
That's funny, when I am browsing in this board, I often wonder why people want to "risk it" so early in the tournament. I think it means that doubling up in the first hand means only little more than jackshit, while losing simply costs you the tournament. FWIW, if I know that one or two of the donks behind me love to raise multiple limpers, I autolimp my monsters. [/ QUOTE ] Yea, I know "why" people don't want to risk it......I'm just saying that when you're crushing your opponents range, it outweights the ICM reasons towards not risking it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
Doubling up early means nothing? That's way off. If you play turbos, most of your losses (I would guess) come from being relatively hand dead / action dead early on and getting short-stacked in later rounds. Chipping up early is a big, big deal (though, obviously, you still want to play tight).
That said, I'm calling here a lot. He either has AA or he has 22-TT: I like your odds. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
[ QUOTE ]
mike, sharkscope him. I'm often calling this in a 39. [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] mike, sharkscope him. I'm often calling this in a 39. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
The key for me is that he was 2nd to limp. I call and would have probably folded if he was UTG.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) JJ and dude limp/limp/re-raise
call all day and dont think twice about it
|
|
|