#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flopped flush vs 2
Whats my optimal line here? Both villains pretty bad, around 42/16/2
Sorry the converter site won't let me login again. ***** Pacific Hand History for Game 62301769 ***** $1/$2 Blinds No Limit Hold'em - *** 10 09 13:43:49 2007 Table Asahi (Real Money) Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 10: Dommi100 ( $106.99 ) Seat 3: possums1 ( $223.25 ) Seat 5: thormaro ( $172.16 ) Seat 6: AlexWaab ( $151.72 ) Seat 7: ug45cwb ( $200 ) Seat 9: Wcxx ( $166.77 ) AlexWaab posts small blind [$1]. ug45cwb posts big blind [$2]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to ug45cwb [ Qc Kc ] Wcxx calls [$2]. Dommi100 folds. possums1 raises [$8]. thormaro folds. AlexWaab calls [$7]. ug45cwb calls [$6]. Wcxx calls [$6]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 6c, 4c, Jc ] AlexWaab bets [$6]. ug45cwb calls [$6]. Wcxx folds. possums1 raises [$24]. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped flush vs 2
I think that you have to raise here. Calling is dangerous since there are so many turns that kill your action or actually beat you.
I raise to 60 and call a push. SMS |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped flush vs 2
so pot is $64 unless i screwed up
i would bet enough to make calling with Ac unprofitable, becasue that is definitely in his range, especially since he seems not scared of the flush on the board. He is probably betting to maximize fold equity here. i wouldnt worry about "scaring anyone off" esp since there are two potential callers |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped flush vs 2
Ok. Here is what happend...
possums1 raises [$24]. AlexWaab calls [$18]. ug45cwb raises [$71]. possums1 folds. AlexWaab folds. ** Summary ** ug45cwb collected [$153]. What if one of the villains calls and the turn brings another club. Are we in check/fold mode? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped flush vs 2
hard to say man, probably c/f cause if he bets youre most likely fooked. This might be far too speculative esp given his stats but i doubt with the 10 or Jc would he think he had the best hand even given the results i still think you played it right and anything else would be too results oriented.
|
|
|