LionelHutz00

[El Diablo]

Leader,

That is a good attitude. Once you don't know how to respond, just say you've made your point and are done. Bravo.

What's your point? That no matter what anyone posts, they should always be given chances? Here's what you don't get. Allowing people to always have a second chance leads to crappy posters emulating those behaviors. And that creates the cycle which leads to the pain-in-the-ass problems Gild is talking about.

It's best for the site that people know that certain things aren't tolerated. Years of experience here have made it abundantly clear to me that 2+2 will not lose any valuable contributors by adopting that type of attitude.

[tuq]

Leader,

Hmmmm, after reading these last couple of posts by daryn and El D I am in agreement with them and as such am switching my allegiance in ModWars™. Nothing personal of course.

[iron81]

[ QUOTE ]
I have to assume Mat was joking about shutting that forum down?

[/ QUOTE ]
I doubt it.

[tuq]

iron,

Posting that after Mat had already shared his feelings in the ATF thread is cheating IMO, and now you are my mortal enemy in ModWars™.

[iron81]

I surrender. Politics is all yours.

[diebitter]

Jesus, sorta Grunching as I've dipped in and out of this, but seriously, inline hardcore porn==ban. It isn't hard.

Gild, recruit 3-4 more mods on the condition that they act on porn and racism swiftly and harshly.

[MEbenhoe]

just want to echo what others are saying that inline hardcore porn = ban, imo.

[tuq]

[ QUOTE ]
Gild, recruit 3-4 more mods on the condition that they act on porn and racism swiftly and harshly.

[/ QUOTE ]
Some of the forums on this site may be mod-heavy (umm, not that any come immediately to mind) but that one seems to be light when you consider the content and the volume. There are some posters like nath, GA, T-Dog or others that would happily pitch in. Dunno, I'm new here but from what I know that seems to make sense.

[daryn]

someone in the ATF thread just posted this:

"Look, how hard would it be to just put a sticky up top that says "NSFW images inline = permaban"? And then enforce it, because everybody's had fair warning?"


how isn't this the exact same thing diablo is saying? leader you have a problem with this somehow?

my reply:

"sounds like a great idea honestly. but you'd be surprised, a lot of people actually disagree with such a resonable policy."

[MEbenhoe]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Gild, recruit 3-4 more mods on the condition that they act on porn and racism swiftly and harshly.

[/ QUOTE ]
Some of the forums on this site may be mod-heavy (umm, not that any come immediately to mind) but that one seems to be light when you consider the content and the volume. There are some posters like nath, GA, T-Dog or others that would happily pitch in. Dunno, I'm new here but from what I know that seems to make sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think mods need to be picked very carefully from that group. Anyone who is all about "Free LionelHutz" is likely not a good choice for example, as how you can you possibly expect someone to enforce rules when they're arguing that the rules shouldn't be enforced. This will never happen, but someone like NT! would be a perfect addition to that forum if he was told the only actions he could take would be on things like inline porn and racism.