Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2006, 11:44 AM
blundy blundy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30
Default Borgata 40-80, KQo

Long time lurker (since '03), first time poster.

Game is running very TAG except for two soft spots who are giving their money away.

Villian in the hand is TAGish with LAG tendancies in position. He is stuck at least a rack, but is playing relatively straight forward. He is directly on my left and we've been banging heads in BvB and button steal situations. He knows I'm TAG, but may see me as a bit weak-tight after a more recent hand that I played passively.

Folded to me in the highjack and I open up with KQo, Villian 3-bets in the CO, folds back to me and I call.

Flop: K-Q-8r

I c/r and villian calls.

Turn: Tx

Bet, call

River: Jx

Your line?

I think this is an easy spot, but I got questioned about my play by a very good player and wanted to get other's opinions. Thanks.

-Blake
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2006, 12:14 PM
johnnyboi1016 johnnyboi1016 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

check/call?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:02 PM
Smarty Smarty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 349
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

Isn't bet-folding standard here?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:06 PM
Nate. Nate. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reading Garner\'s usage dictionary
Posts: 2,189
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

In these games, I find that when Hero checks in this spot, it's an offensive check, meant to pick off a bluff, and everyone knows it, and people don't try to bluff them.

So absent any further read, I'd check and fold. Many of his hands beat you, and (importantly) he's betting almost 100% of what beats you. Every so often he'll show up with KJ or whatever *and* bluff with it, but again this won't happen enough to think you're ahead more than once in nine or so.

In short -- you're beaten here far more than not, almost always by AK, AQ, AJ, or AT. Check and fold, unless this guy will bluff the river *almost every time* he doesn't have a straight, in which case you should check and call.

--Nate
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:23 PM
blundy blundy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

Thanks for the responses so far.

Nate, you're absolutely righr about the offensive check, and I had already made this play once in a BvB situation with him where I bet the flop and turn and check-called my bottom pair on the river and MHWG. So if I check here, I am folding 98% of the time. Checking and calling is my least favorite line, because I think a good/aggressive player is more likely to bluff raise than to bluff bet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2006, 01:54 PM
smurfitup smurfitup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: insomnia
Posts: 607
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

bet/fold
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2006, 02:44 PM
blundy blundy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

[ QUOTE ]
bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]


This was the line I planned to take, but he just made the crying call and MHWG. Betting here seemed thin, but certainly standard against above average opponents.

-Blake
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2006, 02:47 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: north american scum
Posts: 11,413
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

This is a good hand to post, thanks OP. I usually check-call in this spot, and the discussion here taught me that bet/fold is definitely better.

The reason I usually c/c is because it's retarded to check with a straight, so the opponent would know I didn't have an A. Because of that, I'd expect him to value bet worse 2 pairs. But now I see that thinking is wrong, and bet/folding is superior -- unless you think he'll bluff-raise here, which I think is pretty rare.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-13-2006, 04:28 PM
vmacosta vmacosta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,060
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

If you check, will the villain really bet KJ? Many live players won't, particularly if they see you as tight/passive. In this case, c/f is the clear choice. There are obviously more hands you lose to than beat here.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-13-2006, 05:33 PM
blundy blundy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30
Default Re: Borgata 40-80, KQo

[ QUOTE ]
If you check, will the villain really bet KJ? Many live players won't, particularly if they see you as tight/passive. In this case, c/f is the clear choice. There are obviously more hands you lose to than beat here.

[/ QUOTE ]

We definitely agree that villian won't bet a worse hand, but I think the rarity of a bluff raise and the possibility that I get called by a worse two pair make this a good bet/fold spot. I would much rather lose a bet when I have to fold, than miss a bet when I have the best hand.

I will also say that I think a majority of the hands that beat me on the river should be 3-betting the flop trying to buy a free shot at their gutterball or aces-up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.