Party 400 | I'm a huge nit with sets - Page 2

raze · #11 10-20-2007, 03:21 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He had 43s for turned two-pair, so I missed getting his whole stack in this instance with my check-behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you really think that's true then I definitely have to move back to Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

Absolutely... look at that board. I think a two or three-barrel on my part is going to look extremely suspicious. Would you fold two-pair facing a second barrel on a 7-5-3-4 board?

raze · #12 10-20-2007, 03:23 AM

[ QUOTE ]
must we play b/f the turn or do you play b/c ?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's why I didn't bet the turn... what can I put him on when he raises? I can't even have a set-over-set here.

Unknown Soldier · #13 10-20-2007, 04:18 AM

not betting the turn because you don't want to be raised is pretty bad.

what to put him on if he raises? a straight

mustmuck · #14 10-20-2007, 03:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Absolutely... look at that board. I think a two or three-barrel on my part is going to look extremely suspicious. Would you fold two-pair facing a second barrel on a 7-5-3-4 board?

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly, no, but this guy isn't thinking about action and board texture. He's thinking jesus if that guy has a 6 I'm screwed here.