#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sexiness?
SB is somewhat of a spaz. His turn lead range is pretty huge. UTG is most certainly not calling the reraise without a monster draw (which he would raise with himself) a set (which again, he would raise) or top two, which he *might* smoothcall with.
Party Poker Pot Limit Omaha Ring game Blinds: $1/$2 10 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $343.90 TheRempel: $353.05 UTG+2: $304.05 MP1: $313.47 MP2: $245.10 MP3: $209.10 CO: $317.10 Button: $361.30 SB: $124.19 BB: $174.05 Pre-flop: (10 players) TheRempel is UTG+1 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">TheRempel raises to $10</font>, 4 folds, CO calls, Button calls, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls. Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($52, 5 players) SB checks, UTG checks, TheRempel checks, CO checks, Button checks. Turn: 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($52, 5 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $50.35</font>, UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">TheRempel raises to $251.75</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
I would fold this, but i'm only posting my response to see why I'm wrong.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
Given your reads, I would have to say SEXINESS.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
Given CO and Button behind I can see your reasoning. Sometimes I just feel the SEXINESS though.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
Fine if sb is that weak. Otherwise it's hard to put you on a big hand and a decent player should call you with any marginal+ holdings.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
I like it for a lot of reasons. Not somethign I'd pull regularly though.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
I don't see how raise can be right here. Surely SB missed his CR on the flop, and you are a dog to every possible hand UTG could have. That board is so draw heavy, I don't think you have any fold equity with your raise.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
Well I certainly have fold equity against the UTG caller, and the whole point is that is all that really matters. I have yet to see the SB c/r the flop with a set; he may have two pair though.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
I really think it's situation dependent and Rempel obviously had reasons to believe fold equity is very good here. This, at minimum, is good for metagame.
Personally, I do something like this 6 handed probably once every 20 orbits... and only against very specific opponents. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexiness?
Rempel,
I have 2 questions: 1) Is "sexiness" a new euphemism for "lagishness"? 2) When you make that raise on the turn after raising pre and then checking the flop, what hand do they put you on? |
|
|