Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)

[VoraciousReader]

Actually, never mind. I misread that.

Bah at working and typing. Delete.

[chuckleslovakian]

Why the [censored] did we lynch Patton again? Anyway, can we just lynch OH and IY and win this game already? I lied about trying to read through their posts. It is just worthless to even bother. I don't get what the argument is for me anyway. I haven't posted enough? I have been posting all my thoughts quite a bit lately. It just seems they are getting ignored.

[mostsmooth]

what did you say chuck?

[mostsmooth]

vr, that stuff you posted would indicate perhaps ourhouse is a wolf

[chuckleslovakian]

In short terms
I said IY is a good vote, OH is a better vote, Patton was a bad vote.

[chuckleslovakian]

And Spook was also a good vote

[mostsmooth]

[ QUOTE ]
And Spook was also a good vote

[/ QUOTE ]
of course, ldo

[VoraciousReader]

[ QUOTE ]
Damn, this really IS an Old-Timer's Game!

Seer strategies? LOL.

Just vote Stephen, HBE, Patton and we don't even need seers.

[/ QUOTE ]

On the other hand, this day 1 post by OurHouse is interesting.

2 villagers and a wolf. No strategy. Quoted another post. Threw in a LOL.

I give this post a 7 on the Wolf Scale.

[mostsmooth]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Damn, this really IS an Old-Timer's Game!

Seer strategies? LOL.

Just vote Stephen, HBE, Patton and we don't even need seers.

[/ QUOTE ]

On the other hand, this day 1 post by OurHouse is interesting.

2 villagers and a wolf. No strategy. Quoted another post. Threw in a LOL.

I give this post a 7 on the Wolf Scale.

[/ QUOTE ]
agreedish

[VoraciousReader]

Also interesting: as I'm rereading day 1 I'm struck by how quiet the known wolves were. It makes me think that there might be a more active one, which would seem NOT to implicate IronYuppie.