blind battle, auto stack off?

[rand]

i think the straights occasionally play this way

all A up prolly do (but he prolly folds alot of the A9/7 combos on the flop)

and all NFD combos

i think your prolly around 20% against this range and it seems like you need to be about 25% so it looks like a close fold imo

[irockhoess]

ikes - why do you say that since hes willing to take a free card, hes not on the straight? i dont understand that part.

[Kevin Browne]

This is a great hand to debate, and is so opponent driven on whether to call or not. If you are saying he's very aggressive pre then he is repopping 77, 99, 1010, aa for sure and most likely a10? What is his overall aggression factor post???? Turn Aggression factor???

[quickfetus]

I'd definitely call.

Disclaimer: I only play this high live.

[TheWorstPlayer]

i have to call in a blind battle against an aggro opponent even if he has been 'slowing down some postflop'. agree with AEMFJ though that it's pretty close either way. and of course bet the turn.

[aislephive]

I call and don't think it's really that close.

[TheJackale]

[ QUOTE ]
I call and don't think it's really that close.

[/ QUOTE ]

[irockhoess]

this was like 15 or 20 minutes into him joining, so i had no reliable stats to go on. i havent been playing ftp much lately, but in the time i have i havent seen him at 5/10 before.

i think i agree with those that said its pretty close either way and my decision probably won't be really bad/good no matter what i do. I ended up timing down and decided to fold. i couldnt put him on a range i was beating in the 20 seconds i had to decide to warrant calling on this board. at the time i felt bad about folding, but i don't think it was too bad and am not going to beat myself up over it. thanks to everyone that contributed.

[nuggetz87]

i think you have to call just given how you played it.

i do think he has aces up a bunch though unfortunately. just can't fold it bvb because there's other stuff he can have.