|
|
#23
08-28-2007, 09:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
nobody will be permabanned for anything anymore. [/ QUOTE ] you don't have to worry about that. Also the yves example is totally different...that was a problem poster that kept doing stupid [censored]. This is a good poster who did one unbelievably stupid thing and apologized for it and is willing to make nice. gw 
|
|
#25
08-28-2007, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] nobody will be permabanned for anything anymore. [/ QUOTE ] you don't have to worry about that. Also the yves example is totally different...that was a problem poster that kept doing stupid [censored]. This is a good poster who did one unbelievably stupid thing and apologized for it and is willing to make nice. gw [/ QUOTE ] right.... my point is, a guy who you just described as a "problem poster that kept doing stupid [censored]" was given a basically unlimited number of chances. doesn't that say it's pretty damn hard to get permabanned, and therefore people can basically do anything they want?
|
|
#26
08-28-2007, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] nobody will be permabanned for anything anymore. [/ QUOTE ] you don't have to worry about that. Also the yves example is totally different...that was a problem poster that kept doing stupid [censored]. This is a good poster who did one unbelievably stupid thing and apologized for it and is willing to make nice. gw [/ QUOTE ] right.... my point is, a guy who you just described as a "problem poster that kept doing stupid [censored]" was given a basically unlimited number of chances. doesn't that say it's pretty damn hard to get permabanned, and therefore people can basically do anything they want? [/ QUOTE ] No he was certainly not given an unlimited number of chances...and even if he was given a lot of rope, Yves was the exception, not the rule and basically the last person of an era in bbv/bbv4l where after him we were a lot harsher vs. problem posters, learning from our (my) mistakes with yves and it has been working quite well. And yves has NOTHING to do with my decision whatsoever. Yes I am more likely to give people a second chance if they're a good poster who contributes to the forum. If you or El D want to take this to Mat or Ryan I have no problems with it and will not take offense.
|
|
#28
08-28-2007, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LionelHutz00
if something like this happened in a forum with more people who have jobs, i would say permaban for sure [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
i am right on the borderline of this, but i lean towards saying that it deserves a permaban no matter what, even though i like hutz and generally defer to gild on these things.
|
|
#29
08-28-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how long was alobar gone for w/ peachys blog [/ QUOTE ] backstory? [/ QUOTE ] Alobar posted a link to "Peachy's Blog" that actually went to some malicious, vile porn site that hijacked browsers and such. He got a month off. Personally, GW, I agree with the Diablo that 5 days was just far too little. One month has been pretty standard for when good posters make extremely bad errors in judgment.
|
|
#30
08-28-2007, 11:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] how long was alobar gone for w/ peachys blog [/ QUOTE ] backstory? [/ QUOTE ] Alobar posted a link to "Peachy's Blog" that actually went to some malicious, vile porn site that hijacked browsers and such. He got a month off. Personally, GW, I agree with the Diablo that 5 days was just far too little. One month has been pretty standard for when good posters make extremely bad errors in judgment. [/ QUOTE ] yea, I agree in retrospect 5 days is too short, a month would have been better. I still stand by the decision to remove the perma but I agree that it should have been a longer tempban. compromise?
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
