Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:33 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

stars should offer deep stack tables like full tilt has. everyone could sit those with min buyin 100x. would be lots nicer that way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:35 PM
AK87 AK87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 356
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

Stars should also have a bet pot button. And they should also stop being rigged
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:36 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

[ QUOTE ]
Stars should also have a bet pot button. And they should also stop being rigged

[/ QUOTE ]

full tilt = wayyyyy more rigged.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:38 PM
ITILTEZ ITILTEZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: amerika
Posts: 370
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

Something stars(and other sites) should certainly do is to increase the time you have to wait before sitting in with smaller stack then you left with. I doubt this has big impact on their rake(increasing min. buyin might have and thats why they dont do it) income. However it would improve the situation if players would have to wait at least 90mins before comming back.

Also I dont know, but id guess shortstacking is somewhat harder in shorthanded tables. At least it seems like they prefer the games with 7+ players. So adding 6max 25 50 could be a decent idea.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:52 PM
NoahSD NoahSD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,925
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

[ QUOTE ]
Something stars(and other sites) should certainly do is to increase the time you have to wait before sitting in with smaller stack then you left with. I doubt this has big impact on their rake(increasing min. buyin might have and thats why they dont do it) income. However it would improve the situation if players would have to wait at least 90mins before comming back.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a great point.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:09 PM
Daut44 Daut44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 177
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

if we could get stars to raise the min buyin to 30bb like it is in a casino then the problems would be lessened.

besides all the bad manner stuff they do with the hit and running, i just dont like the fact that i cant play optimally against all the big stacks because i have 3 shortstacks behind me who are just going to shove, but the other big stacks dont adapt to the shortstacks so they are playing optimally vs me. they totally ruin the dynamics of the game and make it more boring than it would be normally
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:20 PM
IHateCats IHateCats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 642
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

if you think that is the most unethical thing in online poker you are beyond naive.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:21 PM
AK87 AK87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 356
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

[ QUOTE ]
if we could get stars to raise the min buyin to 30bb like it is in a casino then the problems would be lessened.

besides all the bad manner stuff they do with the hit and running, i just dont like the fact that i cant play optimally against all the big stacks because i have 3 shortstacks behind me who are just going to shove, but the other big stacks dont adapt to the shortstacks so they are playing optimally vs me. they totally ruin the dynamics of the game and make it more boring than it would be normally

[/ QUOTE ]

I personally hate short stacks also. But what you're claiming is that deepstack poker is the only way to play... There's really nothing anyone can do about it so you just have to adapt.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:24 PM
Daut44 Daut44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 177
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

im not claiming deepstack poker is the only way to play.
im just saying 20bb is too low for a minimum buyin.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:27 PM
FlyingStart FlyingStart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: Stars 25-50 Shortstackers

Stars could add tables where you had to buy in full (or some minbuyin like 60BBs), and then players could choose where they wanted to sit.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.