Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:47 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default DOJ responses to House Committee questions

A couple of posts have related that there was an exchange between one or more Committee members abd the DOJ spokesperson, Ms. Hanaway, to the effect that she specifically admitted something about betting on the Internet not being an illegal activity for persons under federal law.

That would be a priceless piece of testimony or answer. however, I have not found it in the video clips I have looked at.

Does anyone have a link or a transcript of that exchange ?

Similarly, anything specifically addressed in her answers with respect to poker ?

Thanks.

(Great job, PPA, Annie Duke.)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:59 PM
oldbookguy oldbookguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: wvgeneralstore.com
Posts: 820
Default Re: DOJ responses to House Committee questions

At the 2:30 mark in this clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTvd8hwjGVo

note, she had to be asked twice, first time she avoided that part of a two part question.

obg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:16 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Re: DOJ responses to House Committee questions

Thanks.

So, if it is not illegal for a poker player under Federal law to gamble on the Internet, and poker sites do not "bet or wager", how is someone engaged in "illegal" Internet gambling, under any law at the Federal level ... thereby triggering the UIGEA ?

(Leaving aside for now the issue of whether a player or site can ever violate a State law.)(Also leaving aside whether a State law can regulate or prohibit International commerce or trade between a US citizen and a foreign company.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:23 PM
JPFisher55 JPFisher55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 963
Default Re: DOJ responses to House Committee questions

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks.

So, if it is not illegal for a poker player under Federal law to gamble on the Internet, and poker sites do not "bet or wager", how is someone engaged in "illegal" Internet gambling, under any law at the Federal level ... thereby triggering the UIGEA ?

(Leaving aside for now the issue of whether a player or site can ever violate a State law.)(Also leaving aside whether a State law can regulate or prohibit International commerce or trade between a US citizen and a foreign company.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point, Milton, another reason why the DOJ has never prosecuted an online poker site, affiliate, Epassporte or pro player touting a site. Too bad no one asked Ms. Hanaway if the DOJ ever prosecuted any entity for operating an online poker site. But she probably would said that online poker was part of the BetOnSports case.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2007, 11:05 AM
catlover catlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 634
Default Re: DOJ responses to House Committee questions

This is very interesting. It is a shame that no one asked her whether it is legal to run an internet poker operation that does not involve any other form of gambling.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.