2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit

[AragornX151]

Against a nit, what's the point of 3-betting this river? Is a 15/7 really calling with worse?

[BobboFitos]

wow. i guess he hasa straightflush. but... wtf.

[skeetm0n]

[ QUOTE ]
Against a nit, what's the point of 3-betting this river? Is a 15/7 really calling with worse?

[/ QUOTE ]

[terp]

he's not bluffing because he would have had to have raised the river for value in the first place, which he's not doing.

[Herrigel]

fold, quick!

[Parlay Slow]

fold

[Imrahil]

I much prefer min 3betting on the river as opposed to making a normal raise as he's more likely to call w/ what you want him to call with which I don't know what it is.

[Ender Wiggin]

This is a simple hand. Who cares if you have fking quads when you can't put villain on a hand you beat. Fairly basic hand reading, just put yourself in villains shoes and put him on a range. Villain is a nit and isn't bluffing for four buy ins here. It's almost impossible that he is bad enough to value shove the jack of diamonds here. I mean come on lol. Villain has the straight flush here more than 99.5% of the time.

/thread.

fwiw you should all check out the thread on the same hand in uNL. The amount of posters saying call is embarassing.

[john kane]

foollddddd.

[Darkfolder]

[ QUOTE ]
It's almost impossible that he is bad enough to value shove the jack of diamonds here. I mean come on lol.

[/ QUOTE ]
Umm, a shove with the Jd would obv not be for value.