SharkScope software

[Nichomacheo]

Question:

Would you rather pay a little to have something that everybody has or pay more for something that you can use exclusively?

The problem is that with more than one person using it at a specific buyin, it becomes less useful since you're competing with that person in addition to the other random signups. Throw in 10 people using it and you'll hardly ever play a fish.

If you have exclusive rights to a stake for a specific period of time, you eliminate this competition, but I would likely charge more for its use.

Comments?

[hra146]

[ QUOTE ]
Question:

Would you rather pay a little to have something that everybody has or pay more for something that you can use exclusively?

The problem is that with more than one person using it at a specific buyin, it becomes less useful since you're competing with that person in addition to the other random signups. Throw in 10 people using it and you'll hardly ever play a fish.

If you have exclusive rights to a stake for a specific period of time, you eliminate this competition, but I would likely charge more for its use.

Comments?

[/ QUOTE ]


I dont really like where this idea is going. Thats only an opinion however.

[Indiana]

[ QUOTE ]
Question:

Would you rather pay a little to have something that everybody has or pay more for something that you can use exclusively?

The problem is that with more than one person using it at a specific buyin, it becomes less useful since you're competing with that person in addition to the other random signups. Throw in 10 people using it and you'll hardly ever play a fish.

If you have exclusive rights to a stake for a specific period of time, you eliminate this competition, but I would likely charge more for its use.

Comments?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd say charge what u think its worth and see how the market reacts....

[cwar]

[ QUOTE ]
Question:

Would you rather pay a little to have something that everybody has or pay more for something that you can use exclusively?

The problem is that with more than one person using it at a specific buyin, it becomes less useful since you're competing with that person in addition to the other random signups. Throw in 10 people using it and you'll hardly ever play a fish.

If you have exclusive rights to a stake for a specific period of time, you eliminate this competition, but I would likely charge more for its use.

Comments?

[/ QUOTE ]
Just sell it to everyone, IMO, trying to sell it exclusively will only make it more complicated for you not to mention the trust issues.

[Nichomacheo]

The economics of the situation make mass distribution unfeasible.

[higHstaKesOwneR]

i would pay a bit more if less people would have access to this tool

is it already ready to use?
does it work on stars without probs?
can you upload a few screenshots or publicize a testversion of this tool that i can have a idea of the software?

sry for the bad english

regards jay

[HokieGreg]

uh yes

[Nichomacheo]

[ QUOTE ]
is it already ready to use?
does it work on stars without probs?
can you upload a few screenshots or publicize a testversion of this tool that i can have a idea of the software?

[/ QUOTE ]
Give me a day.

[higHstaKesOwneR]

yep thanks keep up the good work [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[ChicagoRy]

I have something almost exactly like this, so it's not going to be exclusive for you 110 players.