***Official*** CNN/YouTube GOP debate - Page 10

Taso · #91 11-28-2007, 10:38 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, agreed.

Paul should have been allowed to respond to Tancredo, by the way.

soilworker_24 · #92 11-28-2007, 10:38 PM

WTF does RG's response have to do with the question????

jstnrgrs · #93 11-28-2007, 10:39 PM

I remember they used to have debates in which the audience had to agree to remain silent. I wish they would do that again. the live audience really diminishes the quality of the debate.

Scary_Tiger · #94 11-28-2007, 10:39 PM

count: 10, i think like 8 were Rudy.

Kedu · #95 11-28-2007, 10:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]

You're obsessed.

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

Cumulonimbus · #96 11-28-2007, 10:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]

ah c'mon, he's oooold

Case Closed · #97 11-28-2007, 10:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.

JackWhite · #98 11-28-2007, 10:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
man i hate the MSM. how hard would it be to take a few corporate MSM buildings down, Fight Club style?

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting question....sir

Taso · #99 11-28-2007, 10:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Disagreed.

EvilSteve · #**100** 11-28-2007, 10:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I remember they used to have debates in which the audience had to agree to remain silent. I wish they would do that again. the live audience really diminishes the quality of the debate.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it would make the debates less emotionally driven and you'd have a better discussion of the actual issues. Unfortunately most people wouldn't find it as entertaining to watch, which would hurt ratings. CNN did what was right for CNN.