Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Video Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-06-2007, 11:25 AM
Nicholasp27 Nicholasp27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Springfield
Posts: 24,908
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

if i get a ps3 in the future, i'd only get one with backward compatibility; i wouldn't want to have to keep a ps2 around just to play my ps2 games; i don't care that they are 'cheap' or whatever...i don't wanna clutter up my shelf with a ton of different systems
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-06-2007, 11:58 AM
JMa JMa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,769
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not that I'm against playing videogames at all, but I think you could safely purchase gear for any and every sport you could ever want to play for less than a PS3 costs.

[/ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-06-2007, 01:33 PM
Wheatsauce Wheatsauce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Are you watching closely?
Posts: 213
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]




[/ QUOTE ]

Whatever the balls this is, it is my new favorite sport.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-06-2007, 09:06 PM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

You don't think you could buy a goalie outfit, skates, a stick, and net for $700?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-06-2007, 09:07 PM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

I was referencing sports you play in countries where they actually sell playstation 3s. However, if you really wanted to, you could probably buy $700 worth of food and goats and trade it to someone for their football elephant.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-07-2007, 03:05 AM
Freakin Freakin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,022
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

I was referencing sports you play in countries where they actually sell playstation 3s. However, if you really wanted to, you could probably buy $700 worth of food and goats and trade it to someone for their football elephant.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, football elephant sux0rs!!! 2 years from now hyena on leash will be outselling it 4 to one!!!!1!11!!!!

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-07-2007, 04:08 AM
Duke Duke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SW US
Posts: 5,853
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]
You don't think you could buy a goalie outfit, skates, a stick, and net for $700?

[/ QUOTE ]

Certainly used, but I was under the impression that the pads cost more than $700 by themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:00 AM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

Oh wow, I need to price hockey gear more.

@ Freakin - I dont know what that's from, but that pic is awesome!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:08 AM
TBag TBag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a raccoon suit
Posts: 1,083
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

[ QUOTE ]
Not that I'm against playing videogames at all, but I think you could safely purchase gear for any and every sport you could ever want to play for less than a PS3 costs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right, and an Xbox costs about 5 dollars, AMIRITE?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:30 AM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: PS3: Lowering price, removing all backwards compatibility

Man, if you don't cover 100% of all possible bases with a post, you people will rip someone a new A hole, won't you?

I wonder how many pages each post would be in a thread if everyone constantly felt the need to view and express every view of every possible angle for any post they make.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.