grade the level of poker thinking in this explanation

[HOWMANY]

[ QUOTE ]
Post in BBV or NVG for better responses [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]



[/ QUOTE ]

[mike l.]

i almost did.

[Victor]

i know a bit too much but i would say his read of the bb range and postflop tendencies is way off. thats understandable since he may not have enough info.

however, this, "but with any PP, he's still ahead" is clearly wrong and a mistake a decent player should not be making.

theres proly other errors in there but i just skimmed.

[PokerSparky]

Hero's assumptions about what villain's PF range is could be way off depending on if villain views hero as weak postflop.

[Fianchetto]

B-

No third level thinking in there, I didn't see one thing about what the opponent puts hero on.

[baronzeus]

i play it the same, maybe i suck too

[PartyGirlUK]

[ QUOTE ]
i play it the same, maybe i suck too

[/ QUOTE ]

[PartyGirlUK]

Btw I think his level of thinking is fine.

[gehrig]

[ QUOTE ]
i play it the same, maybe i suck too

[/ QUOTE ]
lol i was afraid to post in this thread bc i play it like this too. river i call sometimes

[HOWMANY]

The problem here is that Mike should have worded the title differently to get the answer he wants. It is pretty obvious what he is getting at but obviously the hand is okay to play like the hero did some of the time.

Mike is clearly trying to just point out that it's a very primitive and not at all deep level of thought but everyone is focusing on the hand itself basically.